How Does Angular Velocity Affect the Angle of a Spring-Mass System?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between angular velocity and the angle of a spring-mass system. An equation is presented that relates the angle α to the angular velocity ω, mass m, spring constant k, and gravitational acceleration g. Participants confirm the equation's validity and suggest using Newton's second law along with elastic force and centripetal acceleration to derive it. The original poster expresses gratitude for the guidance and indicates they have successfully derived the equation independently. The conversation highlights the interplay between physics principles in analyzing spring-mass systems under rotation.
Gavroy
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
hi

i found the following equation that a spring(with constant k) , a mass m rotating with angular velocity ω, will have a constant angle \alpha to the vertical axis that is given by
cos(\alpha)=\frac{g}{\omega^2 l}(1-\frac{m \omega^2}{k})
this looks similar to something like cos(\alpha)=F_{gravitation}/F_{centripetal}-F_{gravitation}/F_{spring} but i do not see the geometrical idea behind this.

i am not sure whether this equation is correct at all, I found it in my physics schoolbook
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 541
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation seems to be OK.
In order to find it you could apply Newton's second law for the vertical and horizontal directions. Use the equation for elastic force and centripetal acceleration, too.
 
thank you for this hint. now, i found it by myself.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top