How Does Binomial Expansion Help Define e Using Limits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paul_G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using binomial expansion to demonstrate that e can be defined as the limit of (1 + 1/n)^n as n approaches infinity. The user is attempting to express this limit in terms of a series involving factorials, specifically aiming to show that it equals the sum of 1/k! for k from 0 to infinity. They seek guidance on manipulating the expressions to eliminate n and simplify the series. The conversation also touches on the Stirling formula as a potential tool for expanding factorials in this context. Overall, the user is looking for foundational resources to better understand these mathematical concepts.
Paul_G
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm currently taking a fairly early stats course, and I'm having a bit of a hangup learning exactly how to use "moments" properly. My general solution whenever I run into problems internalizing things is to do a bunch of easy problems, and to show it from the ground up.

This is my first post here, so I'm not certain how to use the math notationy stuff.

My issue here is fairly simple - I want to show that e = lim n-> inf (1+1/n)^n = 1/0!+1/1!+1/2!+...

So I start with my n-> inf (1+1/n)^n and do binomial expansion.

So e = lim n-> Infinity Sum[(n choose k)*1/n^k, {k, 0, Infinity}].

From here, we can go to Sum[n!/(n-k)!k! * 1/n^k, {k,0,Infinity}]

Next... Okay, next we can change the numerator to (n-1)! and the denominator of the right to n^(k-1), but I have no idea what I can do next, considering I'm trying to get to Sum[1/k!,{k,0,Infinity}]. How do I remove the n's?

Thank you very much, and apologies for the mess.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you know the Stirling formula? You can use it to expand some factorials.
 
Nope, wikipedia doesn't seem to start at the ground for it, either. :( I'll youtube it!
 
What is wrong with the formulas here?
$$n! \sim \sqrt{2 \pi n} \left(\frac{n}{e}\right)^n$$
The ratio of both goes to 1 in the limit n->infinity
 
Perfect, that is exactly the sort of thing I was looking for.

Thanks! I think I need to learn more calculus.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top