How does C affect molecular magnetism according to Olivier Kahn's book?

assyrian_77
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
I am going through Olivier Kahn's book "Molecular Magnetism". I am stuck on something that seems so simple. On page 10, it is stated that

\chi=C\sum_{M_S=-S}^{+S}\frac{{M_S}^2}{2S+1}

The book then states that this leads to

\chi=\frac{C}{3}S(S+1)

I've tried to figure the steps between but I can't get anywhere. What am I missing here?

EDIT: Of course, M_S=-S,-S+1,...,S-1,S




PS. C=\frac{Ng^2\beta^2}{kT} where \beta is the Bohr magneton and k is the Boltzmann constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\sum_{k=1}^n k^2=\frac{1}{6}n(n+1)(2n+1)
 
\chi=C\sum\limits_{M_s=-S}^S \frac{M_S^2}{2S+1}<br /> =C\times 2\times \frac{1}{6} \frac{S(S+1)(2S+1)}{(2S+1)}=\frac{C}{3}S(S+1)
 
snooper007 said:
\sum_{k=1}^n k^2=\frac{1}{6}n(n+1)(2n+1)
Thanks a lot! Of course, I didn't remember that summation at all. It's been a while. :smile:
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top