How Does Cancer Affect the Cell Cycle Through Cyclin/Cdks?

AI Thread Summary
Cancer affects the cell cycle primarily by altering the regulation of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks), leading to uncontrolled cell division. It does not necessarily speed up individual phases of mitosis but increases the frequency of mitotic events. Defective cyclins and cdks can cause continuous mitosis without proper regulation. These proteins are present throughout the cell cycle, including interphase and mitosis, but their dysregulation is particularly impactful during the G1 phase and the transition to S phase. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing cancer treatments targeting cell cycle regulation.
hydralisks
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



General questions about how cancer affects the cell cycle...

1) Does cancer actually speed up the individual phases of mitosis (prophase, metaphase, anaphase, telophase) ... ie metaphase occurs 100x sooner following prophase in a cancer cell compared to a normal cell? or does cancer just increase the number of times mitosis as a whole is performed?

2) Also, it seems that cyclins and cdks play a great role in cancer cells. From my understanding, the cyclin and/or cdk becomes defective and is used too much, causing mitosis to repeat without stop. Is this correct?

3) If I am correct in (2), is there a specific phase in the cell cycle where these cancer inducing cyclins and cdks are found? Are these cyclins and cdks only found in the interphase? Only in G1? Only in mitosis? Throughout all of interphase and mitosis? Only in G2? etc etc



Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to show your attempts to receive help. This is a forum policy.
 
Borek said:
You have to show your attempts to receive help. This is a forum policy.

My attempt at understanding the question is actually meshed into my question above. I am aware of the 3 part guideline enforced on this forum but it is a little difficult to split my question and attempted understanding of it into two different blocks of words

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top