How Does Charge Affect Motion in Outer Space?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the physics principles needed to analyze the motion of a charged ball in outer space. Newton's Second Law is identified as essential for calculating acceleration and displacement, but there are concerns about the large charge of the second ball, which could lead to unrealistic results. The participant struggles with the assumption of whether the second ball is fixed or free to move, impacting calculations. There is confusion regarding the units of charge expressed as /K C, and the validity of using certain kinematic equations under non-constant acceleration is questioned. The conversation highlights the complexities of electric forces and motion in a charged environment.
halo168
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In outer space, a ball with mass 0.25kg and charge +4/K C is shot from 5m towards a +0.5C charged ball with an initial velocity of 20 m/s
  1. What main Physics principle should be used to solve this problem?
  2. What is the closest the small ball will get to the large one?
  3. What is the velocity and acceleration at this position?

Homework Equations


F=ma
vf=v0+2ax
F(electric) = KQq/r^2 where K = 9*10^9 Nm^2/C^2

The Attempt at a Solution


  1. I should use Newton's Second Law because by using F = ma, I could find a, then substitute into the 1D equation for displacement to solve for how far the 0.25kg ball travels.
  2. I got a=F/m = -0.32 m/s^2 and substituted into the equation vf=v0+2ax (I made vf=0) to find x. My answer was 625 m which is not reasonable.
  3. I couldn't find the answer without a correct answer from the second question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not clear whether the second ball is free to "recoil" or is somehow fixed in space.

Not sure what the units /K C means.

0.5 C is a HUGE amount of charge for a ball to have. (That's enough charge to blow the ball apart.)

Do you expect the acceleration of the 0.25 kg ball to remain constant as it approaches the other ball?

The equation vf=v0+2ax is not correct. It looks similar to an equation that is only valid for constant acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes halo168
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top