How Does Charge Distribution Affect Potential in Electromagnetic Fields?

  • Thread starter Thread starter solipsis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
solipsis
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A hoop of radius R and total charge -q is oriented with its normal vector along the z-axis.
A positive charge +q is placed at the centre of the hoop. The potential at a distance r along the z-axis is:

V(r) = (\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0}(\frac{1}{r} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{r^2 + R^2}})

In the case of azimuthal symmetry, the general solution to Laplace's equation \nabla^2 V = 0 is:

V(r,\theta) = \sum^{\infty}_{l=0}(A_l r^l + \frac{B_l}{r^{l+1}})P_l cos(\theta)

Assuming r >> R, use equations (1) and (2) to obtain an expression for the leading term of the potential at points off the axis.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I know that on the axis, theta = 0, so

V(r,\theta) = \sum^{\infty}_{l=0}(A_l r^l + \frac{B_l}{r^{l+1}})P_l

I tried expanding equation (1), I think I have to get it into powers of R/r, but not entirely sure how to do that.

Any pointers/hints to get me started would me much appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got the right idea. I would start by pulling out a factor of R from the denominator in the second term of the on-axis potential.

\sqrt{r^2 + R^2} = R(\cdots ?\cdots)
 
diazona said:
You've got the right idea. I would start by pulling out a factor of R from the denominator in the second term of the on-axis potential.

\sqrt{r^2 + R^2} = R(\cdots ?\cdots)

You mean pull out a factor of r, right? (Since \frac{R}{r}\ll 1 )

\sqrt{r^2 + R^2} = r\sqrt{\cdots ?\cdots}
 
gabbagabbahey said:
You mean pull out a factor of r, right? (Since \frac{R}{r}\ll 1 )

\sqrt{r^2 + R^2} = r\sqrt{\cdots ?\cdots}
Ah, yes, thanks for catching that.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top