How Does Coulomb's Law Calculate Forces Between Two Point Charges?

AI Thread Summary
Coulomb's Law is used to calculate the force between two point charges, with the formula F = (Kc * Q1 * Q2) / R^2, where Kc is the Coulomb constant. In the given problem, a charge of 2 µC at the origin and a charge of 6 µC at 1 m were analyzed, resulting in an incorrect initial calculation due to unit errors. The correct force on charge q2 is -0.108 N, indicating attraction, and the force on q1 should yield the same magnitude but in the opposite direction. It is crucial to convert microcoulombs to coulombs for accurate results, as the units of the Coulomb constant require this conversion. Attention to units is essential in physics to ensure correct calculations and interpretations.
sushi362
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Part 1:

A charge of 2 µC is at the origin, and a charge
of 6 µC is on the x-axis at x = 1 m.
Find the force on charge q2. The Colulomb
constant is 8.98755 × 10^9 N · m2/C2.

Answer in units of N

Part 2:

Find the force on q1.
Answer in units of N


Homework Equations



(Kc * Q2 * Q1)/R^2
Kc = 8.98x10^9

The Attempt at a Solution



So basically, for part one, i did..

(Kc * 2 * 6)/(1^2) = 1.07850E11
answer is positive so they should be repelling each other, but the program says its wrong, and I am not sure where to go for part 2.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When doing physics always, always mind your units, you should have put
-(Kc*2E-6*6E-6) / (1^2) = -0.108N

The second part should be the same answer, if not it will be the answer to Part 1 in its negated form (0.108N) or it will be basically the same equation with one of the point charges removed, i.e.

(Kc*q2) / (R^2)

But that is the expression for and electric field of a point charge, so Part 2 should just be the negative answer of part 1.
 
Last edited:
JonDrew said:
When doing physics always, always mind your units, you should have put
(Kc*2E-6*6E-6) / (1^2) = 0.108N

The second part should be the same answer, if not it will be basically the same equation with one of the point charges removed, i.e. (Kc*q2) / (R^2) = F

What i don't understand is, my professor did a similar problem in class, except with 3 charges, and used the units in microcoloumbs and got the right answer? Or should i be doing all the problems in coloumbs instead?
 
sushi362 said:
What i don't understand is, my professor did a similar problem in class, except with 3 charges, and used the units in microcoloumbs and got the right answer? Or should i be doing all the problems in coloumbs instead?
You should convert the charges to coulombs from micro coulombs. You can verify this by paying careful attention to the units, particularly the units of Coulomb's constant. If your teacher used micro coulombs, perhaps he had adjusted the constant beforehand; otherwise he couldn't have gotten the right answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top