How Does Curvature Vary in Non-Euclidean Triangle Manifolds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle
AI Thread Summary
In non-Euclidean triangle manifolds, the average curvature can be derived from the triangle's dimensions. A triangle with legs 1/a and 1/b, and hypotenuse (a²+b²)⁻¹/², presents a different curvature than its Euclidean counterpart. The discussion emphasizes the need to determine the constant curvature of this manifold. Understanding how curvature varies in these triangles is crucial for exploring geometric properties. The inquiry highlights the relationship between triangle dimensions and manifold curvature.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
A triangle with legs a and b, and hypotenuse (a2+b2)1/2, maps directly onto an Euclidean plane, of curvature zero. What is the average curvature of a manifold conformed to a triangle of legs 1/a and 1/b, and hypotenuse (a2+b2)-1/2?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The above should read: "What is the constant curvature of a manifold..."
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top