How Does Curved Space Around Black Holes Compare to L2 and LP Spaces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter granpa
  • Start date Start date
granpa
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
7
In L2 space c2 = a2 + b2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lp_space#Motivation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_inequality

If we draw a large triangle on a curved surface like the Earth then the Pythagorean theorem won't work. But if we shrink the triangle down the curvature becomes less and less until it approaches being completely flat and the Pythagorean theorem works again.

If we draw a large triangle in LP space where P<>2 then the Pythagorean theorem also won't work. The difference is that it still won't work even if one shrinks the triangle down to nothing.

My question is what happens in the curved space of a black hole? Is it like the curved surface of the Earth or like the intrinsic curvature (no, that probably isn't right. maybe 'intrinsic distortion from L2 space) of LP space? Does a small enough piece of space near a black hole behave like regular flat L2 space (yes i know, technically it would be minkowski space but i am only interested in the space component and nonrelativistic speeds)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
no one knows the answer to that question, mathmatically then yes it should work
it depends if you are past the event horizon ( point of no return) yet
becouse at the center of a black hole, the singularity, then there is said to be infinate mass and therefore infinate curviture, so physically there you could not work like that :)
 
Thanks for the response.

Thats what I assumed but when I was reading the wiki article about LP space I suddenly realized that I didnt really know.
 
granpa said:
My question is what happens in the curved space of a black hole? Is it like the curved surface of the Earth or like the intrinsic curvature (no, that probably isn't right. maybe 'intrinsic distortion from L2 space) of LP space? Does a small enough piece of space near a black hole behave like regular flat L2 space (yes i know, technically it would be minkowski space but i am only interested in the space component and nonrelativistic speeds)

Anywhere in spacetime, whether near a black hole, inside or outside the event horizon, or anywhere else, behaves locally "like the curved surface of the Earth" and not "like Lp space". The equivalence principle means that if you zoom in close enough to any event, the surrounding spacetime looks almost like the flat spacetime of Minkowski space, which is analogous to (but not identical to) L2 space.

An Lp space, when p ≠ 2, has a notion only of "distance" and no notion of "angle" unlike spacetime. (Technically it is "normed vector space", but not an "inner product space".)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top