B How Does Earth's Water Compare to Potential Ocean and Desert Planets?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter lpetrich
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ocean Planets
AI Thread Summary
Earth's surface water constitutes about 0.00023 of its total mass, with oceans making up 96.5% of this water, covering 71% of the planet. The discussion explores the implications of varying water levels, suggesting that a significant reduction could lead to a desert planet, while an increase could create an ocean planet, requiring four to five times the current water volume. The rarity of Earth's water distribution is highlighted, with comparisons made to potential ocean planets in the TRAPPIST-1 system, where several planets may possess substantial water. The conversation also touches on the implications for the Drake Equation, particularly how the fraction of liquid water on a planet could influence the emergence of life. Lastly, the unique properties of deep ocean planets, including high-pressure ice phases, are noted as a fascinating aspect of planetary science.
lpetrich
Science Advisor
Messages
998
Reaction score
180
Let's first look at our homeworld, to use as a reference.

The Earth's surface water has a mass about 0.00023 times the Earth's total mass, with the planetary ocean having 96.5% of it. The ocean has a mean depth of 3.8 km, and they cover 71% of the Earth's surface, giving a planetwide average of 2.7 km. I use singular, because what are usually called oceans are one continuous body of water, sometimes called the World Ocean.

Turning to the Earth's interior, estimates vary widely. Water distribution on Earth - Wikipedia from https://www.sciencenews.org/article/quest-trace-origin-earth%E2%80%99s-water-%E2%80%98-complete-mess%E2%80%99: 1.5 to 11 oceans. https://www.coursehero.com/file/p4khek5/Estimates-of-the-mass-of-water-inside-Earth-range-from-1-O-to-50-O-where-1-O/: 1 to 50 oceans, noting Drake & Campins (2006) estimating 10 oceans and Marty (2012) estimating 4 to 12 oceans.

If the Earth had much less surface water, then most of it would be in the crust as groundwater. About 1.69% of the Earth's surface water is groundwater, so if the Earth had 1% of its present amount of surface water, then the Earth would look waterless: a desert planet.

If the Earth had much more surface water, then all its land area would be drowned, making it an ocean planet. One can estimate how much water would be needed by considering the height of the highest possible mountain. From the surrounding terrain, the highest mountains on our planet are Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea at about 10.3 km. Mt. Everest is the highest in gravitational potential, but it rests on some already-elevated terrain. That makes it about 12.6 km above the average ocean floor. That means that 4 to 5 times the water would be enough.

Why might the Earth have almost enough water to cover its land area, but not quite?

One can try to work it out from theory, but the theory of planetary formation already has had some nasty curveballs thrown at it by observations. Curveballs like warm and hot Jovian planets. But one can look for Earth-sized habitable-zone planets, and indeed, it has been possible to find some such planets.

[1704.04290] Updated Masses for the TRAPPIST-1 Planets -- though those masses have big error bars, they are enough to show that at least five of those planets are likely ocean planets: b, e, f, g, h. Planet d straddles the all-rock line, meaning that it also may be an ocean planet, and planet c is between the rock and iron lines, as Venus and the Earth are. It would be difficult to rule out a few-hundred-km-deep ocean on c, however.

So the Earth's amount of water might be a rarity.

Anything on other exoplanets?
 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi lpetrich:

I found your post quite interesting. I was wondering if you had given any thought about the implications of your analysis to the Drake Equation.
It seems to me that in particular the value of the ne and fl terms (items iii and iv in the Wikipedia article) would be influenced by the fraction of the planet that would be liquid water. Do you have any thoughts about this?

Regards,
Buzz
 
Of the Drake-equation factors, fl refers to the fraction of suitable planets where organisms emerge, so it would not be affected. However, ne will be affected.

As to evidence of life on other planets, that has been seriously discussed. The most observable evidence is biomarker gases like oxygen and ozone and methane, especially together. [astro-ph/0609398] Spectral Evolution of an Earth-Like Planet, New Biomarkers Honed to Help Search for Life on Earth-like Exoplanets - Scientific American, Exoplanet Exploration: Planets Beyond our Solar System: Detecting biomarkers on faraway exoplanets.

As to the origin of life, there appears to be only one example on our planet that has present-day survivors. But research has gotten surprisingly far on the earliest phases of the evolution of our planet's biota, like the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA). Our last common ancestor inhaled hydrogen from underwater volcanoes | Science | AAAS, The physiology and habitat of the last universal common ancestor : Nature Microbiology.

But that's another story.
 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom
Ocean planets have the interesting property that if their oceans are deep enough, the water at the bottom may be frozen as high-pressure phases of ice. Water has a delightfully complicated phase diagram with numerous solid phases: Water phase diagram, Ice - Wikipedia. Familiar ice is Ice Ih, other phases are higher Roman numerals.

Here is a table of some melting points. The pressure will be in Earth-ocean-kilometer equivalents: 100 bar or 107 pascal.
  • 0 C, 273 K -- 62 km -- liquid 1.19 g/cm^3, Ice VI 1.31 g/cm^3
  • 30 C, 303 K -- 105 km -- liquid, Ice VI 1.31 g/cm^3
  • 82 C, 355 K -- 222 km -- liquid 1.35 g/cm^3, Ice VI 1.31 g/cm^3, Ice VII 1.57 g/cm^3
  • 125 C, 398 K -- 280 km -- liquid, Ice VII, 1.69 g/cm^3 -- highest organism-growth temperature
  • 190 C, 463 K -- 400 km -- liquid, Ice VII, 1.85 g/cm^3 -- dry-DNA stability limit
  • 400 C, 673 K -- 1700 km -- liquid, Ice VII 2.11 g/cm^3
  • 700 C, 973 K -- 10,500 km -- liquid, Ice VII 3.19 g/cm^3
  • 1000 C, 1273 K -- 42,000 km -- liquid, Ice VII, Ice X, both ices 4.5 g/cm^3
So it will take a volcano to melt the ice if it is thick enough.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top