I How Does Einstein's Curvature of Space Affect Celestial Orbits?

AI Thread Summary
Einstein's theory posits that the curvature of spacetime, created by celestial bodies, dictates the orbital paths of other bodies without the involvement of forces. Celestial bodies, like Earth, follow natural trajectories in spacetime, experiencing free-fall around larger masses, such as the Sun. The gravitational effects of a body on itself do not alter its orbital path, as these effects are uniform in all directions. The discussion highlights that the influence of a body's gravity is negligible when considering the curvature of spacetime. Understanding these principles clarifies the dynamics of celestial orbits.
nnkl
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Einstein's theory states that curvature of space (created by a celestial body around itself) determines the orbital path of other celestial bodies around it within that curved space by a constant lateral force acting towards the centre upon that revolving body. Then why is that a similar force does not impede the revolving body along its orbit by its own warping of space in front of it which is supposed to impede it's orbital velocity thereby decaying it's angular momentum over time?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
nnkl said:
Einstein's theory states that curvature of space (created by a celestial body around itself) determines the orbital path of other celestial bodies around it within that curved space by a constant lateral force acting towards the centre upon that revolving body. Then why is that a similar force does not impede the revolving body along its orbit by its own warping of space in front of it which is supposed to impede it's orbital velocity thereby decaying it's angular momentum over time?

It's actually the curvature of spacetime, rather than space. And, there are no forces involved. The Earth is following a natural path through the spacetime around the Sun.

As far as the Earth is concerned it is in free-fall around the Sun. Its own gravity has no effect on this path. A ball that is thrown up in any direction is equally pulled back to Earth. But, the Earth doesn't pull itself back anywhere. The effect the Earth has on itself is equal in every direction.
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest
PeroK said:
But, the Earth doesn't pull itself back anywhere.
True, only when the ratio of the masses is small.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
911
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top