How Does Electron Uncertainty Compare to Helium Atom Size?

AI Thread Summary
The average kinetic energy of an electron in a ground-state helium atom is calculated to be 2.4x10^3 kJ/mol, leading to an electron velocity of approximately 3.0e6 m/s. The uncertainty in this velocity, measured at 10%, results in a minimum position uncertainty of Δx=2.0e-10 m. This uncertainty is then compared to the effective radius of a helium atom, which is 130 pm (1.30e-10 m). The discussion emphasizes understanding the significance of the calculated uncertainty relative to the atomic size rather than seeking a numerical ratio. Overall, the uncertainty in the electron's position is a relevant factor when considering the dimensions of the helium atom.
littlebearrrr
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(NOTE: I solved the first two parts of this problem, but I included it anyway so you have background knowledge for the third question)

The average kinetic energy of an electron in a ground-state helium atom is 2.4x10^3 kJ/mol.

A. What is the corresponding electron velocity?

B. An experiment measures this velocity with an uncertainty of 10%. Calculate the minimum uncertainty in the position of the electron for this experiment.

C. The effective radius of a helium atom is 130 pm. Is the uncertainty in the position you calculated in B a significant fraction of this radius?

Homework Equations



A. KE=(1/2)mv^2

B. Δx*Δv≥ h/(4pi)m

C. N/A


The Attempt at a Solution



A. Just multiplied 2.4e3 kJ/mol by (1 mole/6.022e23 electrons) and used the above equation to solve for v. Got 3.0e6 m/s.

B. Took 10% of my velocity, plugged that into the above inequality. Obtained Δx=2.0e-10 m (can someone check if this is right?)

C. If the above answer in B is right, do I just take that answer and divide it by 1.30e-10 m to get my answer for C?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
littlebearrrr said:
B. Took 10% of my velocity, plugged that into the above inequality. Obtained Δx=2.0e-10 m (can someone check if this is right?)
That looks correct.

littlebearrrr said:
C. If the above answer in B is right, do I just take that answer and divide it by 1.30e-10 m to get my answer for C?
I don't think that C calls for a numerical result, rather an appreciation of the result of B compared to the effective radius.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hey DrClaude, thanks for your help/checking my answers again :)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top