How Does Electrostatic Induction Affect Neutral Objects?

AI Thread Summary
Electrostatic induction occurs when a charged object, like a negatively charged rod, is brought near a neutral electroscope, causing the mobile electrons in the electroscope to move away, resulting in a negative charge in the leaves. This movement happens because like charges repel, leading to a redistribution of charges within the conductor. The exposed positive ions in the electroscope are attracted to the rod, creating an imbalance that allows for the observation of attraction despite the electroscope remaining neutral overall. If the charged rod is too close, some electrons may transfer from the rod to the electroscope, leaving a small residual charge that can be neutralized by grounding. Understanding these interactions highlights the unique properties of conductors and the behavior of charges in electrostatic induction.
punjabi_monster
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
This is my understanding of induction:
If a negatively charged rod is brought near (but not touching) a neutral electroscope, the positive charges will move towards the rod, and the leaves will become negatively charged and repel. If grounded, electrons will exit the electroscope, and the electroscope will have a positive charge.

What i do not understand is when the rod is brought near the neutral electroscope, why the leaves get negatively charged?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's actually a kind of complicated question! Ideally, it's supposed to work like this. When you bring a charged object (like the rod) near a conductor (like the electroscope leaves) the electric field of the rod interacts with the charges that make up the conductor.

Now the conductor is a NEUTRAL object but being a conductor it has some very special properties. The ions in the lattice tend to be bound in place in a sort of lattice structure. They are big and heavy compared with the electrons many of which enjoy walking about like social butterflies but not wanting to be associated with any particular ion. They are mobile and free to move about as they please and everything is harmonious as long as everything remains (net) neutral.

However, when the charged rod gets closer those conducting electrons become a bit skittish and are repelled by the oncoming electrons (like charges repel) so they tend to move away to the furthest reaches of their conducting home. In their wake, they leave somewhat exposed ions that want to move toward the rod's electrons (opposite charges attract). Even though the conductor remains neutral, the charges (electrons and ions) are no longer evenly distributed so the electrons in the rod and the ions in the conductor tug away fondly at each other and you observe the attraction.

In practice, matters become just a little more complicated particularly if the attraction is a little too strong. Some of the electrons on the rod can actually make the jump from the rod to the conductor across the gap between them. This would leave a small residual charge on the conducting leaf. They would eventually go away after you remove the rod but that takes time. You speed up the process of removing the excess charge by grounding it.
 
ok thanks a lot. :approve: :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top