How Does Energy Density Change with Scale Factor in Cosmology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cosmoshadow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology Fluid
cosmoshadow
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The fluid equation in cosmology is given as:

\dot{\epsilon} + 3*(\dot{a}/a)*(\epsilon+P) = 0

Where \epsilon is the energy density and a(t) is a scale factor.

Using the equation of state, P = w*\epsilon, show how \epsilon change with a(t).

Homework Equations



\dot{\epsilon} + 3*(\dot{a}/a)*(\epsilon+P) = 0
P = w*\epsilon

The Attempt at a Solution



I can solve for the equation to the point where I re-arrange it to look like this:

\dot{\epsilon}/\epsilon = -3*(1+w)*(\dot{a}/a)

I do not know how to proceed from here. I know that this equation is supposed to end up like this,

\epsilon<sub>w</sub>(a) = \epsilon<sub>w,0</sub>*a-3*(1+w)

but I do not know how to get to this point. Can someone assist me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can someone take a look at this? I'm pretty sure its a simple operation that I'm failing to realize.
 
bump?
 
You have your equation
\frac{\dot\epsilon}{\epsilon} = -3(w+1)\frac{\dot a}{a}
From here you can eliminate the time-dependence
\frac{d\epsilon}{\epsilon} = -3(w+1)\frac{da}{a}
and this is a differential equation involving just \epsilon and a you can solve by integrating both sides
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top