How Does Energy Relate to Work in Physics?

AI Thread Summary
Energy is defined as the capacity to do work, and the relationship between energy and work is that the change in energy is equal to the work done. When a force field performs work on an object, this work can increase the object's kinetic energy, allowing it to do work later. In conservative fields, the potential energy decreases as work is done, reflecting a reduced capacity for future work. For instance, a rock's potential energy is high at the top of a hill, enabling it to perform significant work as it falls, while at the bottom, its potential energy is low. This illustrates that as work is done, energy decreases, confirming the fundamental relationship between energy and work.
san203
Gold Member
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
Hello all.
This is not a "What is Energy" Thread but rather a question about its relation with work.
I understand that energy has been defined as the ability to do work. So why is change in energy is equal to work? Cant energy be equal to work.

Also when the force field is doing work on a object, will the work done on the object by field be equal to the work that the object can do later?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Positive work creates positive potential energy as in pushing a block up an incline.

A block sliding down an incline has positive kinetic energy (negative work).

I think this is why we separate the two terms.
 
The total internal energy is a state function whereas mechanical work is a process function. Put more loosely, I can easily say that a particle has "this amount of energy for the given state" but it makes no sense to say that a particle has "this amount of work for the given state".
 
san203 said:
I understand that energy has been defined as the ability to do work. So why is change in energy is equal to work? Cant energy be equal to work.
So remember that energy is the capacity to do work, and that capacity is limited. As you do work you lose the capacity to do more work. So as you do work your energy decreases, and therefore the work is equal to the change in the energy.

san203 said:
Also when the force field is doing work on a object, will the work done on the object by field be equal to the work that the object can do later?
Yes, assuming that the force field is conservative. The work done on the object by the field will increase the KE of the object, which can then be used to do work later.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
DaleSpam said:
So remember that energy is the capacity to do work, and that capacity is limited. As you do work you lose the capacity to do more work. So as you do work your energy decreases, and therefore the work is equal to the change in the energy.

I see. But i was talking about the work done by the field. why is Work done by field = change in energy of object? same reason i guess? Silly question i know, but it happens when you think about something for too too long:-p
 
san203 said:
I see. But i was talking about the work done by the field. why is Work done by field = change in energy of object?
A conservative field has an associated potential. So an object being acted on by such a field has potential energy. As the field does work on the object the potential energy of the object is decreased, meaning that the object has a reduced capacity to do work.

For example, a rock under the influence of gravity has potential energy (mgh). At the top of a hill its potential energy is high and it has the capacity to do a lot of work by falling down. At the bottom of the hill the potential energy is low and it has little capacity to do work by falling down. The change in the rock's potential energy is equal to the work done by gravity on the rock.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top