How does exactly higher capacitance have more bang for your buck ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Lobster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
AI Thread Summary
Higher capacitance means a capacitor can store more charge at a given voltage, leading to increased energy storage. The relationship between capacitance (C), charge (Q), and voltage (V) is defined by the equation C = Q/V, indicating that a higher capacitance allows for more charge to be stored per unit of voltage. The energy stored in a capacitor is given by W = 1/2 * C * V^2, which shows that with higher capacitance, more energy can be stored for the same voltage. The discussion highlights the confusion around how increased charge per potential translates to greater energy capacity. Understanding these relationships clarifies why higher capacitance offers "more bang for your buck" in energy storage.
The_Lobster
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
How does exactly higher capacitance have "more bang for your buck"?

Hi!

I'm trying to really grasp the concept of capacitance. Whenever I see a description of the definition, C=Q/V, they always say either: "More charge stored per potential", or "more bang for your buck".

I don't really see how more charge per potential relates to more energy in the capacitor?

By using W = 1/2 * C * V^2, we get the same amount of energy if V = 2V and Q = 4C, as if V = 4V and Q = 2C (in the former case C = 2F, and in the latter C = 0.5F).

Could anyone please clarify why having more charge per potential means "more energy is stored"? or how that relates to having "more bang for your buck"?.

Also, keeping in mind that potential is potential energy per unit charge, U = qV, shouldn't there be more potential energy all together if there is more charge AND more potential?

Sorry if this should be simple stuff! I just feel every definition I've read jumps over exactly *why* more charge per potential means more energy stored...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If C is 1 farad and you charge to 1 volt then you have 1 coulomb of charge. If C is 2 farads and you charge to 1 volt then you have 2 coulombs.

Charge per potential
Coulombs per potential
coulombs per volt
Q per volt
Q per V
Q/V

All identical, I just replaced words wit symbols.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top