How does Excel anticipate a sampling distribution using just one sample?

musicgold
Messages
303
Reaction score
19
Hi,

I know that Standard Error of a coefficient is the standard deviation of the sampling distribution associated with the coefficient. I understand the concept.

What puzzles me is this: We have just one random sample to work with. The calculator or Excel doesn’t have any info on the actual population or any other sample. Then how can it anticipate a sampling distribution and calculate its standard deviation to give us the Standard Error?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
musicgold said:
Hi,

I know that Standard Error of a coefficient is the standard deviation of the sampling distribution associated with the coefficient. I understand the concept.

What puzzles me is this: We have just one random sample to work with. The calculator or Excel doesn’t have any info on the actual population or any other sample. Then how can it anticipate a sampling distribution and calculate its standard deviation to give us the Standard Error?

Thanks.

The standard error of the mean is SE = s/\sqrt {n} where s is the sample standard deviation. In other words you are estimating the population \sigma from the sample of size n. The concept is that a truly random sample can yield a valid estimate of \sigma. Obviously, as an estimate, it can be refined by additional sampling. The Central Limit Theorem states that the estimates of the mean will tend toward a normal distribution regardless of the population distribution. It's clear that the SE declines with increasing n for fixed s.
 
Last edited:
Thanks SW VandeCarr.


In other words you are estimating the population σ from the sample of size n.
I thought SE is the std dev of the sampling distribution.
 
musicgold said:
Thanks SW VandeCarr.
I thought SE is the std dev of the sampling distribution.

Yes, but that's not the same as the sd of the individual sample. The terminology is a bit confusing. I suggest you look it up.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top