How Does Frequency Alter Output Voltage in an RLC Circuit?

AI Thread Summary
In an RLC circuit, the output voltage across the capacitor is influenced by the frequency of the input signal. The discussion focuses on calculating the output voltage ratios for frequencies of 490kHz and 535kHz compared to a tuned frequency of 540kHz. The initial approach suggested that the output voltage ratio could be derived directly from the frequency ratio, yielding values around 0.9. However, participants noted the need for a more comprehensive equation that accounts for reactances in the circuit. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between frequency and voltage in RLC circuits for accurate calculations.
Alouette
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A radio tuner built by connecting an L=0.58mH inductor and variable capacitor in series with an antenna. The driving voltage is provided by the radiowaves that pass through the antenna, and the total internal resistance of the circuit is R=2.6Ohms.

The variable capacitor is adjusted to tune the radio to 540kHz because of a capacitance C1 = 1.5 x 10^(-10), and the quality factor of the circuit with C1 is 756.

(a) If another station operates at 490kHz with the same amplitude at your location, what is the ratio of the output voltage due to this background signal to the output of the signal for which the circuit has been tuned? The output voltage is the voltage across the capacitor.

(b) Find this same ratio if the other station operates with the same amplitude at frequency 535kHz

Homework Equations



q = (XL) / (R) = 2*∏*(L/R)*f [this is the voltage across the capacitor, f = frequency]

The Attempt at a Solution



Well since the only variable is frequency, I thought that the ratio of output voltage is basically the ratio of the frequencies. As in this:

(2*∏*(L/R)*490kHz) / (2*∏*(L/R)*540kHz)

So for both (a) and (b), the ratios would have been:

(a) 490/540 & (b) 535/540

Yet this gives me too high of a number (both are ~ 0.9). Am I missing a factor in my equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alouette said:

Homework Statement



A radio tuner built by connecting an L=0.58mH inductor and variable capacitor in series with an antenna. The driving voltage is provided by the radiowaves that pass through the antenna, and the total internal resistance of the circuit is R=2.6Ohms.

The variable capacitor is adjusted to tune the radio to 540kHz because of a capacitance C1 = 1.5 x 10^(-10), and the quality factor of the circuit with C1 is 756.

(a) If another station operates at 490kHz with the same amplitude at your location, what is the ratio of the output voltage due to this background signal to the output of the signal for which the circuit has been tuned? The output voltage is the voltage across the capacitor.

(b) Find this same ratio if the other station operates with the same amplitude at frequency 535kHz


Homework Equations



q = (XL) / (R) = 2*∏*(L/R)*f [this is the voltage across the capacitor, f = frequency]
Hmm. That would be the Q-factor for a coil with inductance L and resistance R. How do you figure it's the voltage across the capacitor of a series RLC circuit?

The Attempt at a Solution



Well since the only variable is frequency, I thought that the ratio of output voltage is basically the ratio of the frequencies. As in this:

(2*∏*(L/R)*490kHz) / (2*∏*(L/R)*540kHz)

So for both (a) and (b), the ratios would have been:

(a) 490/540 & (b) 535/540

Yet this gives me too high of a number (both are ~ 0.9). Am I missing a factor in my equation?
I think you're missing an entire equation :smile: What's the expression for the magnitude of the voltage across the capacitor in a series RLC circuit given a unit stimulus (1V @ frequency f)?

HINT: It's convenient to work symbolically with reactances XL, XC and plug in the actual values later.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top