How Does Gauss' Law Apply to a Spherical Conducting Shell with a Central Charge?

AI Thread Summary
A point charge of -5.0×10^-12 C is located at the center of a spherical conducting shell with inner and outer radii of 3.5 cm and 4.0 cm, respectively. The electric field just outside the shell is 8.0 N/C, prompting calculations for the charge densities on both the inner and outer surfaces of the shell. Using Gauss's Law, the charge on the inner surface is determined by the enclosed charge, while the outer surface charge can be calculated based on the electric field. The net charge on the conductor is not zero, and careful attention to units and the correct application of Gauss's Law is emphasized. The discussion highlights the importance of treating the surfaces as Gaussian spheres to solve for the respective charges.
Ignitia
Messages
21
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A point charge q=−5.0×10−12 C is placed at the center of a spherical conducting shell of inner radius 3.5cm and outer radius 4.0 cm. The electric field just above the surface of the conductor is directed radially outward and has magnitude 8.0 N/C. (a) What is the charge density on the inner surface of the shell? (b)What is the charge density on the outer surface of the shell? (c) What is the net charge on the conductor?

Homework Equations


E=K (Q/r2)

K: Coloumb's Constant, so

(E*r2)/K = Q

with Q being the derivative of the enclosed q=−5.0×10−12 C

and

σ= Q/S

With S = ∫ 4πr2dr

3. The Attempt at a Solution


So if I plug in the values accordingly, I should get:

a) r = 3.5
σ= Q/S
σ= ((E*r2)/K)/∫ 4πr2dr (integrate from 0 to 3.5)


b) r = 4.5
σ= Q/S
σ= ((E*r2)/K)/∫ 4πr2dr (integrate from 3.5 to 4.5)

c) Should just be the same as q=−5.0×10−12 C

Before I plug this into a calculator and get the value, is this correct?

Edit: The integrate sign isn't showing up, so the little circle is actually that.​
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No need for any (non-trivial) integration. Start here: Imagine a Gaussian surface just outside the conducting sphere. What total charge must it contain?
 
Well, if E=8.0 N/C then it's

|E*dA
E * |dA
E*A = 8.0*4πr^2 (with a sphere Gaussian surface)

I am still confused, however.
 
Hold on, I think I got it. Treat the surfaces of the conductors as Gaussian Spheres, with respect to the r and given charges? Is that it?

A) q=−5.0×10−12 C is the charge to the surface so its just q/(4*pi*r^2) with r=3.5
B) E=8.0N/C so plug that into E=K q/r^2 to get the second q, and then q/(4*pi*r^2) with r=4.5

So how do you get C?

Edit: Actually, net charge would be 0 on the conductor, wouldn't it?
 
Last edited:
Ignitia said:
Edit: Actually, net charge would be 0 on the conductor, wouldn't it?
No.

Once again, start here: You have the field just outside the sphere, thus at r = 4.0 cm. Use Gauss' law for a spherical surface of that radius to find the total charge contained within. Once you have the total charge, you can figure out what must be the charge on the conducting sphere, and then how that charge is distributed on the inner and outer surfaces.
 
Ignitia said:
Hold on, I think I got it. Treat the surfaces of the conductors as Gaussian Spheres, with respect to the r and given charges? Is that it?

A) q=−5.0×10−12 C is the charge to the surface so its just q/(4*pi*r^2) with r=3.5
B) E=8.0N/C so plug that into E=K q/r^2 to get the second q, and then q/(4*pi*r^2) with r=4.5

So how do you get C?

Edit: Actually, net charge would be 0 on the conductor, wouldn't it?
I don't see Gauss's Law stated anywhere in this thread. (Did I overlook it? I'm fairly old.)

For A) Be careful of units. r = 3.5cm, not 3.5m .

For B) Use Gauss's Law directly to simplify the calculation. (B.T.W.) OP states that r = 4.0cm, not 4.5cm.
... but what you have is otherwise correct. - - - Maybe call this charge Q, or QTotal or ..., but something other than q.​

What is this "C" you refer to?

And:
Don't assume the net charge is zero.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top