How Does Gauss' Law Apply to the Electric Field Around a Charged Metal Ball?

kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A metal ball with radius R = 0,6 m is charged with Q = 0.15 nC. Find the electrical field as function of the distance r from the center of the ball.


The Attempt at a Solution





Gauss law:

Q = e0*E(r)*A = e0*E(r)*4*pi*R^2

which gives

E(r) = Q / e0*4*pi*R^2

I know that inside the ball, the field will be 0. But obviously this is not a function of r...Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're fine.

E(r) = 0 for r<R is perfectly acceptable as a function of r.
 
And outside the ball? I would expext the field to decrease with increasing r, not be constant...
 
kasse said:
And outside the ball? I would expext the field to decrease with increasing r, not be constant...
Right. You have that already done in your first post. (Just change R to r in your equation for E.)
 
rajxen

I guess you are correct. The field inside a conductor is zero.

kasse said:

Homework Statement



A metal ball with radius R = 0,6 m is charged with Q = 0.15 nC. Find the electrical field as function of the distance r from the center of the ball.


The Attempt at a Solution





Gauss law:

Q = e0*E(r)*A = e0*E(r)*4*pi*R^2

which gives

E(r) = Q / e0*4*pi*R^2

I know that inside the ball, the field will be 0. But obviously this is not a function of r...Am I on the right track?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top