How Does Gauss's Law Apply to Electric Fields at Points P2 and P3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jesuslovesu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E-field Gauss
AI Thread Summary
Gauss's Law was applied to derive the electric field for a cylindrical charge distribution, resulting in E = (ρ * r) / (2ε₀) for points outside the cylinder. At Point 1 (P1), the electric field was determined to be 0 V/m due to the radial distance being zero at the surface. There was confusion regarding the electric field at Point 2 (P2), as it seemed counterintuitive for it to also be zero. The discussion shifted to calculating the electric field at Point 3 (P3) using the electric field equation for a charged disk, with integration suggested to find the total field. The consensus emphasized that Gauss's Law may not be applicable for finite-length cylinders, and integrating the derived electric field expression was the recommended approach.
jesuslovesu
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Gauss and E-Field

Homework Statement


http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/9452/eletroof9.th.png

My main problem with this problem is finding the electric field at Point 2 (P2)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I derived the electric field using Gauss's Law for a cylindrical charge distribution.
E (2\pi rL ) = \rho(\pi r^2 L) / \varepsilon_0
E = \frac{\rho * r}{2\varepsilon_0}
So I found E at P1 to be 0 V/m

Now onto finding E at P2, according to my equation, it would seem that E is 0, since the radial distance is 0, however that seems strange to me, if the point is at the surface of the charged volume cylinder, wouldn't there be some charge, I know it's not a conductor but still I would think that there would be some charge?And since I've got it all out here, is the E field at P3 just the integral [3/2L, L/2] of a charged disk?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The gausses law won't help you much here.
Try working with Ex = k*q*x/r^3.
 
Thanks for your reply,

I can't use Gauss's Law for finding any of the points? I know usually the cylinder is an infinite length if you want to find E, but even for Point 1 I can't use it?
 
Basically not in or outside finite length cylinder the tangential forces will cancel only at the midpoints. Try finding E on axis of a charged disc first.
 
Last edited:
Ok so I've got the equation for a charged disk
2\pi k \rho (1 - \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+a^2} ) } how do I integrate that over the length (L) to get the electric field of the cylinder?

Would I say that dE = 2\pi k \rho (1 - \frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+a^2} ) } and then integrate dE from 0 to L or do I need to differentiate Edisk before I do that?
 
Last edited:
Just integrate it form 0 to L, since ddQ = 2*pi*rho*a*da*dx and u integrated it along a then your equation should still contain dx.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top