How does General Relativity contradict quantum mechanics?

lizzie96
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
How does General Relativity "contradict" quantum mechanics?

I couldn't work out exactly where to post this. I've heard several times that QM and General relativity "contradict" each other and in certain extreme conditions this becomes a problem. Is this right? I've only heard this in very vague terms and never read a technical explanation of why. Could anyone explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They do not contradict each other, we just don't know how physics looks like if both are important at the same time.
It is expected that gravity will show quantum-effects as well, but plugging gravity into the formalism of quantum field theory leads to things we cannot calculate (more technical: renormalization does not work).
 
One particular case in which the predictions of GR appear to be inconsistent with QM is black holes. Briefly: GR predicts that a quantum system that falls into a black hole will be destroyed in the singularity at its center, along with the quantum information it contains; but this violates unitarity, a basic principle of QM, which says, basically, that quantum information can't be destroyed. This is called the "black hole information paradox"; the Wikipedia page has a decent overview:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_information_paradox

The bottom line is that, as we know them today, both GR and QM are incomplete theories, so they don't so much "contradict" each other as fail to cover all possible physical scenarios.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top