How Does Gravitational Force Affect a Snowball Fired from a Cliff?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the physics of a snowball fired from a cliff, specifically analyzing the work done by gravitational force and changes in gravitational potential energy. For part (a), the work done by gravity should be calculated using the vertical displacement, leading to a positive value, as gravity acts downward. In part (b), the change in gravitational potential energy is clarified to be independent of the reference point chosen, as it only depends on the change in height. For part (c), the calculation of potential energy at ground level is confirmed to be correct, emphasizing that gravitational potential energy is dependent on the height relative to the chosen reference point. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the direction of forces and the correct application of formulas in physics.
Ginny Mac
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
A 1.50 kg snowball is fired from a cliff 12.5 m high. The snowball's initial velocity is 14.0 m/s, directed at 41.0 degrees above the horizontal. (a) How much work is done by the gravitational force during its flight to the flat ground below the cliff? (b) What is the change in gravitational potential energy of the snowball-Earth system during flight? (c) If the grav. potential energy is taken to be zero at the height of the cliff, what is its value when the snowball reaches the ground?

For (a), I have used
Wg= mgd (cos theta) to get Wg = (1.50 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(12.5 m)(cos41), and arrived at -.987 J/m.

For (b), wouldn't this be indeterminate? I thought we needed a reference point for y to calculate the change in gravitational potential energy.

For (c), I used U-Uinitial = mg(y-yinitial), and arrived at -183.75 J. My reasoning is that the change in potential energy does not depend on choice of reference point for the snowball on the ground (at y=0), so instead it depends on change in y. Therefore, we get change in U = (1.50 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0-12.5 m)=-183.75 J.

I think I am getting caught up and confused in physical properties, etc. Please help if I am wrong or please let me know if I am correct in my reasoning! Thank you so much.

Gin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ginny Mac said:
For (a), I have used
Wg= mgd (cos theta) to get Wg = (1.50 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(12.5 m)(cos41), and arrived at -.987 J/m.
Realize that gravity acts straight down, not at an angle. And since the displacement and the force are in the same direction, the work done will be positive. And the units of work would be J, not J/m.

For (b), wouldn't this be indeterminate? I thought we needed a reference point for y to calculate the change in gravitational potential energy.
The change in gravitational potential energy does not depend on the reference point used. Pick any reference point you like. (If they ask, like in the next part, for the potential energy--not just the change--then they must give a reference point. And they did for part c.)

For (c), I used U-Uinitial = mg(y-yinitial), and arrived at -183.75 J. My reasoning is that the change in potential energy does not depend on choice of reference point for the snowball on the ground (at y=0), so instead it depends on change in y. Therefore, we get change in U = (1.50 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0-12.5 m)=-183.75 J.
Your answer is correct, but your reasoning is a bit convoluted (no need to calculate changes in PE). The gravitational PE is given by mgy, where y is measured from the reference point. If the point in question is below the reference point, then y is negative.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top