How Does Gravity Warp Space-Time According to Einstein's Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter threewood14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space-time
AI Thread Summary
Einstein's theory of general relativity posits that gravity warps space-time, allowing light from distant stars to appear in different locations due to the curvature of space-time caused by massive bodies like the sun. Gravitons, or gravity waves, do not have mass and exert their influence at the speed of light, not instantaneously. The discussion touches on the expansion of the universe post-Big Bang, suggesting that galaxies may eventually converge back to their origin, though this is contested. Critics argue that the universe is expanding continuously, with no central point for galaxies to revolve around. Overall, the conversation highlights misconceptions about gravity's effects and the nature of the universe's expansion.
threewood14
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
According to Einstein's theory of general relativity, gravity bends or warps space-time. this is because the gravitons, or gravity waves, contain no mass and therefore exert their force over large distances with infinite speed. in other words, light from a star that passes by a large body, like our sun, could appear in a place that it is not. the gravity from the sun would bend space time so that even though light may seem to follow a striaght path, it is actually following a curved one. the gravity of large bodies doesn't affect places lightyears away at this magnitude because gravity's force diminishes as it gets farther away from its source. this has led many physicists to believe that if one went in a straight line, they would eventualy end up at the same place after a period of time. this is because all the matter in the universe has warped space time so much, that space time would appear like the Earth or sphere. (as if looked through a 2d space) i would agree that at some point in time, all the matter in the universe was very hot and dense. (the big bang) let us go through what i think will happen throughout the expansion of the universe. first, the big bang would take place obviously. next, like it has been found, galaxies that were formed would expand from the point of the big bang. since there is much evidence to say that gravity will not stop this expansion and conclude in an event known as the big crunch, it is logical to say that the universe would continue to excpand forever. however, since the matter in the universe bends space time so much, they would eventually meet either halfway around the universe, or back at were the big bang took place. this wouold result in another big bang. i accept this because it seems that everything that is clear to us is very similar. for example, atoms have a nucleus in which electrons revolve around. the moon revolves around the earth. the Earth revolves around the sun along with all of the planets in our solar system. the sun revolves around the center of our galaxy. wouldn't it be safe to say that the galaxies in our universe revolve around the center of the universe. it is very hard to imagine such a thing in 3d space so i will use 2d space for now. galaxies could be represented as electrons and the center of the universe is represented by the nucleus of an atom. this would imply that the universe is finite, but spacetime is infinite. our universe is contained in space time.

fire away people!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
One of the first thing you must learn is to use some paragraph structure, reading your post is painfull.

Next you need to understand, that much of which you think you understand, you do not.

For example:
1. gravity is not instantenous, it travels at c.

2. According to Quantum Mechanics, atomic structure is NOT isomorphic to the structure of a solar system. This, first model, of the atom is good only for basic concepts, it simply does not work for real applications. I wish that they would never even mention this model simply because it leads novices far astray.
Co
 
Hi. You have unfortunately got many things wrong. (But don't blame yourself, it's not easy to get a clear picture of this in the beginning.)

According to Einstein's theory of general relativity, gravity bends or warps space-time. this is because the gravitons, or gravity waves, contain no mass and therefore exert their force over large distances with infinite speed.

The speed is c, not infinite.

first, the big bang would take place obviously. next, like it has been found, galaxies that were formed would expand from the point of the big bang.

There is no single point where we can say Big Bang started. The singularity is now everywhere.

however, since the matter in the universe bends space time so much, they would eventually meet either halfway around the universe, or back at were the big bang took place

No. All matter will move further and further away from each other.
Compare with a 2D-universe existing ON the surface of a balloon which is expanding.

wouldn't it be safe to say that the galaxies in our universe revolve around the center of the universe.

No, because there is no center to move around!
 
Last edited:
I read in a Brief History of Time that gravity is instantaneous. Wouldn't that mean that the gravitons travel at an infinite distance?
 
"because the gravitons, or gravity waves, contain no mass and therefore exert their force over large distances with infinite speed."--threewood14

No. Keep in mind that photons also "contain no mass" and they move (in vacuum, and as measured by an inertial observer) at constant speed c, which is most definitely finite.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top