How Does Increased Demand for Pillows Affect the Price of Clothes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Composite
AI Thread Summary
An increase in demand for pillows leads to a higher price for pillows, prompting suppliers to increase production. This heightened production requires more cotton, driving up the demand and price of cotton. As cotton prices rise, clothing manufacturers face increased production costs. Consequently, they reduce their supply of clothes, resulting in an increase in clothing prices. The analysis aligns with the laws of supply and demand.
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Suppose that cotton is used to produce only two products, pillows and clothes. If the demand for pillows increases, what will happen to the price of clothes? Explain your answer. Assume that the laws of supply and demand hold.


Homework Equations


Laws of supply and demand


The Attempt at a Solution


Since pillow's demand increases, its price increases, which makes it profitable for pillow suppliers to raise output. The raise in output is equivalent to an increased demand for cotton, since cotton is an input for pillow production.

The increased demand for cotton is reflected in an increase in its price, which is partially borne by clothes manufacturers in the form of increased costs. These increased costs force clothing manufacturers to reduce supply, causing the price of clothes to increase.

Please tell me if I am correct.

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks logical.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top