How does increasing potential difference affect the magnetic force on electrons?

AI Thread Summary
Doubling the current in two parallel conductors results in a quadrupling of the magnetic force between them, as indicated by the formula F=ILB, where B also increases with current. The confusion arises from not accounting for the change in the magnetic field (B) when the current is doubled. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding how the magnetic field is generated and its dependence on current and distance between the conductors. Additionally, the impact of increasing potential difference on the force acting on electrons is questioned, with a need for clarification on its relevance. Overall, the relationship between current, magnetic fields, and forces is crucial in understanding electromagnetic interactions.
MIA6
Messages
231
Reaction score
0
1.Two long, straight, parallel conductors carry equal currents and are spaced 1.0 meter apart. If the current in each conductor is doubled, the magnitude o the magnetic force acting between the conductors will be 1)Doubled 4) quadrupled.
I chose 2 because I used the formula is F=ILB, so if I is doubled, then 2F=2ILB, F doubled as well, but the answer was 4), I didn’t use d=1 in that formula, so is there any other formula which includes d between two conductors?

2. Assume the magnetic field produced by the magnet and the electric field produced by plates X and Y remain constant. If the potential difference between the filament and the plate is increased, the force of the magnetic field on the electrons will
1) increase 2) decrease or 3) remain the same
I don’t understand why potential difference V matters the force? And what does it mean by filament?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MIA6,

MIA6 said:
1.Two long, straight, parallel conductors carry equal currents and are spaced 1.0 meter apart. If the current in each conductor is doubled, the magnitude o the magnetic force acting between the conductors will be 1)Doubled 4) quadrupled.
I chose 2 because I used the formula is F=ILB, so if I is doubled, then 2F=2ILB, F doubled as well, but the answer was 4), I didn’t use d=1 in that formula, so is there any other formula which includes d between two conductors?


Call them wire 1 and wire 2. You are looking at the force on wire 1, and the I in that equation is the current of wire 1. What does B in that formula represent? and is there another formula for it?

(There are other ways to get this answer, but your approach will work fine.)
 
alphysicist said:
Hi MIA6,




Call them wire 1 and wire 2. You are looking at the force on wire 1, and the I in that equation is the current of wire 1. What does B in that formula represent? and is there another formula for it?

(There are other ways to get this answer, but your approach will work fine.)

But my approach was wrong in this case. It's supposed to quadruple, but mine doubled.
 
MIA6 said:
But my approach was wrong in this case. It's supposed to quadruple, but mine doubled.

No, your approach will work, you just did not figure in all the changes. Your equation is:

<br /> F=ILB<br />

so you saw that I will double and L will stay the same. But what happens to B? It does not stay the same, and so my question was what is B? What is creating it in this case, and what other equation describes it?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top