I How Does Inverse Kinematics Benefit Cross-Section Measurements?

EJIn
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
My question is what inverse kinematics is.
Many scientists are using inverse kinematics for measuring cross-section or something.
For example, suppose that we measure cross section of 14N+p->n+14O.
We can use N14 for beam and p for target. But, we can also do the other way.
When they use inverse kinematics, what advantages can they have?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a few reasons to do an experiment in inverse kinematics.

The first is beam/target availability. Some nuclei are more appropriate to use as targets than as beams, or vice-versa. A good example is if one of the nuclei are radioactive - then generally that must be the beam.

The second reason is that of kinematics. If you have a heavy beam on a light target, everything is going to be forward focused, which can be beneficial for efficiency purposes, for example, if you want to wack everything into a mass spectrometer. Also, at high energies, doing an experiment in inverse kinematics ensures that all the products will leave the target, so you have a lower threshold.
 
Thank you for answering my question.
But, I wonder again that at high energies, all the products will leave the target, so you have a lower threshold.
I wonder how it can be done and why we can have a lower threshold.
 
Imagine you want to study the reaction at an energy of e.g. 100 keV, and for simplification let's assume the reaction does not need or release energy.
You can shoot a proton with an energy of 100 keV on nitrogen, then you get (typically) a neutron with about 5 keV and oxygen with 95 keV. At those energies both get stopped really fast, so you need an extremely thin target, and even then most of your products will lose some notable energy in the material.
You can also shoot nitrogen with an energy of 1.4 MeV on a proton, then you typically get a neutron with an energy of 100 keV and oxygen with an energy of about 1.3 MeV. That allows them to get out of the target much more easily.

At tens of GeV, everything will leave the target, sure, but the point of measuring the threshold energy is to have energies as low as possible.
 
  • Like
Likes e.bar.goum
Thank you for answering my question.
I can understand it. Thanks
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top