How does light lose energy as it travels over distance?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter scijeebus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Light
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of light losing energy as it travels over distance, particularly in the context of cosmic redshift and the expansion of the universe. Participants clarify that while the wavelength of light increases, leading to a perceived decrease in energy, the actual energy of photons remains constant. The consensus suggests that this perceived loss is due to changes in the coordinate system rather than a physical loss of energy. The conversation also touches on the implications of energy dissipation in the universe and how it relates to fundamental physical principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmic redshift and its implications in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with the Doppler effect and its impact on light frequency
  • Knowledge of photon energy and its relationship to wavelength
  • Basic principles of wave propagation and energy dissipation in physical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of cosmic microwave background radiation on photon energy
  • Study the effects of the Doppler effect on light from moving sources
  • Explore the concept of coordinate expansion versus physical expansion in cosmology
  • Investigate energy dissipation mechanisms in expanding media
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of cosmology interested in the behavior of light in an expanding universe and the fundamental principles governing energy and wave propagation.

scijeebus
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
How does light "lose" energy as it travels over distance?

So the universe is said to be expanding because light's wavelength is spreading out at a greater rate per greater distance, but with the wavelength becomes longer, the energy becomes smaller, so where is that energy going? How is it actually being lost?
 
Science news on Phys.org


I don't think energy is being lost I think our observations of it become different. For instance when moving closer to a light source
the light becomes stronger and the frequency we observe becomes larger. The inverse happens when we move further away from
the light source. The doppler effect makes it seem like the light is changing frequency.
 
Garry Go said:
I don't think energy is being lost I think our observations of it become different. For instance when moving closer to a light source
the light becomes stronger and the frequency we observe becomes larger. The inverse happens when we move further away from
the light source. The doppler effect makes it seem like the light is changing frequency.

Sorry Gary. This is wrong. Intensity changes with distance. Energy of photons doesn't.

The question remains: where does (did) the energy of a cosmologically redshifted photon go?

If you get on a train moving very fast and look behind you the light is also redshifted. Where did the energy go in this easier case?
 


scijeebus said:
So the universe is said to be expanding because light's wavelength is spreading out at a greater rate per greater distance, but with the wavelength becomes longer, the energy becomes smaller, so where is that energy going? How is it actually being lost?
It's just dissipated via topological irregularities and obstructions in the medium. Why do originally very localized disturbances (say, dropping a pebble into a pond of water) on the surface of a pool of water disperse as they do (ie., propagate more or less omnidirectionally), and dissipate? These are examples of fundamental dynamical physical principles or laws. The evolutions of physical systems approach equilibrium.

If our universe is a finite expanding wave in some medium of unknown structure, then it's reasonable to suppose that the total energy of our universe is decreasing -- and if so, then the behavior of waves in media at less than the universal scale is in accordance with the behavior of the universal wave.
 
Last edited:


Antiphon said:
Sorry Gary. This is wrong. Intensity changes with distance. Energy of photons doesn't.

Sorry my mistake I didn't mean to say that the light source itself becomes stronger (I should watch my wording more closely). Light's energy doesn't actually change.
 
Last edited:


scijeebus said:
So the universe is said to be expanding because light's wavelength is spreading out at a greater rate per greater distance, but with the wavelength becomes longer, the energy becomes smaller, so where is that energy going? How is it actually being lost?
I suppose that the current consensus viewpoint is that expansion is coordinate expansion not physical expansion.
I view it that way - light that is traveling toward us does not undergo any change, it's coordinate system that changes over time i.e. measurement sticks become shorter and clocks become faster.

So the question actually should be where matter gets energy instead of where light is putting it.
 


I can see how it would work with waves, since although a wave would get longer it would also come in for a longer time so the total amount would stay the same. I have no idea how this would work with photon's since you'd need to get more of them somehow.
 
I already answered this question in https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=613451.
 


Garry Go said:
Sorry my mistake I didn't mean to say that the light source itself becomes stronger (I should watch my wording more closely). Light's energy doesn't actually change.

Actually, it does. Each photon of the cosmic microwave background is far less energetic in our reference frame than it was in the frame from which it was originally emitted, shortly after the Big Bang. Where did that energy go? How did it get lost?
 
  • #10


DLuckyE said:
I can see how it would work with waves, since although a wave would get longer it would also come in for a longer time so the total amount would stay the same. I have no idea how this would work with photon's since you'd need to get more of them somehow.

Why would you need to get more of them?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
813
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K