How Does Light Travel from (-1,1) to (1,1) with Varying Refraction Index?

lifeonfire
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose a ray of light travels from (x,y) = (-1,1) to (x,y) = (1,1) in a region where the index of refraction is n(y) = e^y.

(a) Find the path.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Is this okay?
The positions of the light ray are given by
initial (xi,yi) = (-1,1)
Final (xf,yf) = (+1,1)
Clearly the Y coordinate is invaiant
So
the refractive index of the region
n(y) = e^y
n(1) = e = 2.718
As the light ray travells, the index of refraction is invariant, so the ray will travell in straight line path from (xi,yi) to (xf,yf).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not true. Since the light moves faster in regions of lower refractive index, it can get from x=-1 to x=1 faster by traveling a path that deviates from a straight line and spends more time in the region with y<1 where the propagation speed is faster. Although this path will be physically longer, the time of propagation will be less. Since light always takes the path of least time, it will not follow a straight line. Finding the exact path is a calculus of variations problem.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top