How Does Light Travel Through a Gradually Changing Refractive Medium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yoran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Refraction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving the travel time of light through a gradually changing refractive medium, specifically an atmosphere with a linearly increasing index of refraction. The initial solution proposed an incorrect relationship for the index of refraction, leading to a conclusion that the travel time would be less than in a vacuum. A correction was made to the equation for the refractive index, confirming that the time taken must indeed be greater than in a vacuum. The final resolution indicates that the corrected calculations yield a valid solution, satisfying the condition that the time must be greater. The participants express relief at resolving the misunderstanding regarding the refractive index and travel time.
yoran
Messages
116
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I found a solution to the following problem but I don't think it is right.

Homework Statement


A ray of light enters the atmosphere of a planet. It is perpendicular to the atmosphere. When it enters the atmosphere, the index of refraction equals the index of refraction of vacuum but it increases linearly as it comes closer to the planet. The light ray has to cover a distance h in the atmosphere in order to reach the planet. When the light ray arrives at the surface of the planet, the index of refraction equals n_f. How long does it take before the light ray hits the surface of the planet?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


We know that the index of refraction increases linearly so its equation is of the form
n(x) = ax + b
with x being 0 at the edge of the atmosphere and being h at the surface of the planet. We know that
n(0) = 1 and
n(h) = n_f
Solving for a and b gives
n(x) = \frac{n_f - 1}{x} + 1

Since
v = \frac{dx}{dt}
then
dt = \frac{dx}{v}
Using
n(x) = \frac{n_f - 1}{x} + 1
we get
x = \frac{h}{n_f-1}n(x) - \frac{h}{n_f-1}
thus
dx = \frac{h}{n-1}dn

We also have that
n = \frac{c}{v} so v = \frac{c}{n}
Combining this with dt = \frac{dx}{v} gives
dt = \frac{h}{n_f-1}dn\frac{n}{c} = \frac{hn}{c(n_f-1)}dn
which gives
t = \int_0^{n_f} \frac{hn}{c(n_f-1)}dn = \frac{h}{c}\frac{{n_f}^2}{2(n_f-1)}
However, I don't think this is correct because the time must be smaller than if the light ray moves in vacuum. Since it takes \frac{h}{c} time to cover a distance of h in vacuum, we must have that
\frac{{n_f}^2}{2(n_f-1)} < 1
in order for the solution to be correct. However, this is never when n \geq 1 so the answer must be wrong.

Where did it go wrong?

Thank you?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The time must be greater, not smaller...
 
yoran said:

The Attempt at a Solution


We know that the index of refraction increases linearly so its equation is of the form
n(x) = ax + b
with x being 0 at the edge of the atmosphere and being h at the surface of the planet. We know that
n(0) = 1 and
n(h) = n_f
Solving for a and b gives
n(x) = \frac{n_f - 1}{x} + 1
Shouldn't that be:
n(x) = (\frac{n_f - 1}{h})x + 1
 
Doc Al said:
Shouldn't that be:
n(x) = (\frac{n_f - 1}{h})x + 1
Yes, you're right.

BrendanH said:
The time must be greater, not smaller...
Damn I feel sooooo stupid sometimes... Must be the studying. Thanks anyway! My problem's solved then since
\frac{n^2}{2(n-1)} > 1
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top