How Does Logarithmic Solution Limit the Roots of x^a=b?

  • Thread starter Thread starter n_kelthuzad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation x^a = b using both root and logarithmic methods. It highlights that while the root method can yield both positive and negative solutions, the logarithmic method only provides the positive solution due to the nature of logarithms. The conversation raises questions about the number of solutions when a is rational or irrational, and the implications when a or b are not real numbers. A key point made is that the square root operation results in the absolute value of x, which explains why only the positive solution appears in logarithmic calculations. Overall, understanding the limitations of logarithmic solutions in this context is crucial for accurately determining the roots of the equation.
n_kelthuzad
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
if x^a=b (a,b are constants)
then there are two ways of finding x: root and log
so for example, x^2=4
by root:
(x^2)^(1/2)=(4)^(1/2)
x=\pm2
by log:
2 ln (x) = 2 ln 2
x=2
but it is yet impossible to obtain the negative x from logs. How are you supposed to do it? And here's a few questions:
1.when a is rational how do you know x have 1 or 2 answers?
2.what happens when a is not rational?
3.what happens when a or(and) b is not real?


thanks
Victor Lu
16
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
x^a=b
log[x](b)=a <--- [x] is base x
log(b)/log(x)=a
(1/a)*log(b)=log(x)
log(b^(1/a))=log(x)
b^(1/a)=x
 
also i think i can say that there is no difference in whether you change a to rational or irrational, and there will always be two solutions, as it will always be some root
but i don't know about non-real numbers, sorry.
 
n_kelthuzad said:
if x^a=b (a,b are constants)
then there are two ways of finding x: root and log
so for example, x^2=4
by root:
(x^2)^(1/2)=(4)^(1/2)
x=\pm2
by log:
2 ln (x) = 2 ln 2
x=2
but it is yet impossible to obtain the negative x from logs. How are you supposed to do it? And here's a few questions:
1.when a is rational how do you know x have 1 or 2 answers?
2.what happens when a is not rational?
3.what happens when a or(and) b is not real?


thanks
Victor Lu
16
Hi, Victor!

when you take the SQUARE root of x^2, the CORRECT answer is root(x^2)=|x|, not x.
|x| is what we call "the absolute value" of the number x, i.e, its distance from 0 (irrespective of direction), which is always a non-negative number.

Thus, solving x^2=4 with the square root operation gives you FIRST:
|x|=2

Then, when you wish to remove the absolute value sign, you get two solutions.

root(4)=2 always, never -2
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top