How Does Lorentz Force Affect Work Done Despite No Energy Transfer?

AI Thread Summary
The Lorentz force law indicates that while a charged particle experiences a force in a magnetic field, no work is done when the angle between the force and velocity is 90 degrees, resulting in zero energy transfer. This raises questions about how a charge can maintain a velocity in a magnetic field if no work is done. It is clarified that work is only done when there is a component of force in the direction of velocity. A counter-example illustrates that a particle can have kinetic energy and move without work being done, such as sliding on a frictionless surface. The charge likely retains its velocity from prior motion before entering the magnetic field.
spidey
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
From Lorentz force law,

F = q (v х B) = q v B sin θ
F = q v B [For θ = 90]

W = F * d = F d cos θ
w = 0 [For θ = 90]

How come we have a force but no work done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you think work should be done? Work is done where the force has a component in the direction of the velocity.
 
Phrak said:
Do you think work should be done? Work is done where the force has a component in the direction of the velocity.

if w=0 then energy =0, then how the charge q goes at velocity v in field B.from where the charge q gets energy?
 
spidey said:
if w=0 then energy =0
Not true. Counter-example: a particle sliding across a frictionless table with velocity v. There is no work being done, but then energy is non-zero.
spidey said:
then how the charge q goes at velocity v in field B.from where the charge q gets energy?
Perhaps, the charge was traveling at velocity v before it entered the magnetic field?
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
346
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top