How does motion affect the potential energy of a spring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ravisastry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Motion
ravisastry
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
we know that physical objects are affected by motion, their energy increases as they are accelerated. what about pure energy ? say i have a box with some potential energy stored in it (like a coiled spring or a battery etc). when i accelerate this setup, there will be change in the mass of the materials, but will the potential energy stored in the spring also change ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it will. One way to see this is to study the energy associated with the electromagnetic field and see how it varies as the velocity changes. This energy will increase by the same factor gamma = 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) that mechanical mass increases. In fact, it was by studying the behavior of electromagnetism that Einstein and others derived special relativity.
 
oh i was on the impression that motion won't have any effect on light or EMR. consider this setup where we have any apparatus where pulses of light are produced. when we move the apparatus close to speed of light, the velocity of the light emitted from aparatus, will still remain the same. also, i believe there won't be any change in its frequency or amplitude, which means the motion has no effect on its energy content. pls correct me if I am wrong here...
actually i was thinking about time and I am a firm believer that time is a man made concept. In reality time doesn't exist. any physical entity can be detected or measured ? what about time ? (clocks don't measure time)
my explanation for non variance of speed of light is that, motion has no effect of EMR and hence time doesn't apply to EMR. time applies only to physical objects (rather, we humans can apply time only to matter)
 
If two observers with different relative motion view light (electromagnetic radiation), it's true they will both see the light moving at the same speed. But the frequency and hence the energy content of the radiation will be different as viewed by the two observers. Because the two observers view time and space differently, one will see the light to have a longer wavelength (lambda) and lower frequency(nu) than the other, while the product (lambda*nu = c) will be the same.
 
thanks for the clarification !
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top