How Does Nonlocality Impact Macroscopic Systems Like Human Consciousness?

bladerunner
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello Physics Geniuses,
Can any of you explain the physics of nonlocality as it applies to macroscopic systems - such as a human being and human consciousness? We have an increasingly apparent anomaly in psychology/psychiatry which is an apparent singularity: realtime networks of real people connected at many levels - consciousness, verbal conversation and kinetic (telesomatic) effects. These connections have been demonstrated in a significant and growing body of
peer-reviewed studies (some in peer-reviewed medical journals) and no one has the slightest clue as to mechanisms involved!
I am an experimental psychologist - all ideas and thoughts welcomed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nonlocality as it applies to macroscopic systems has been studied in the context of quantum entanglement, which is a phenomenon in which two particles interact and become so closely connected that they can be considered one system. This connection allows for instantaneous communication between the particles, regardless of the distance that separates them. While entanglement has not yet been demonstrated with macroscopic objects, there are a number of theories that suggest it could be possible. Some theories suggest that entanglement could occur at the level of cells or even molecules, resulting in nonlocal effects on the macroscopic level. Other theories suggest that nonlocal effects could be mediated by an underlying field of energy that connects all particles and objects in the universe. However, further research is needed to determine how nonlocal effects manifest in macroscopic systems.
 


Macroscopic singularities refer to events or phenomena that occur at a large scale and cannot be explained by our current understanding of physics. In the context of nonlocality, this refers to the idea that two or more objects can be connected or influence each other without any physical interaction or exchange of information. This concept has been studied extensively in quantum mechanics, where particles separated by large distances can still be entangled and affect each other's states.

In terms of human beings and consciousness, the concept of nonlocality raises many interesting questions. Can our thoughts and emotions be influenced by others without any physical interaction? Can our consciousness be connected to others in a non-local way? These are difficult questions to answer, as the mechanisms behind consciousness and its interaction with the physical world are still not fully understood.

The anomaly in psychology/psychiatry that you mention is a fascinating topic, and it is not surprising that there is growing interest and research in this area. The idea of real-time networks of people connected at different levels, including consciousness, verbal communication, and even physical effects, challenges our current understanding of the mind and its relationship to the body.

One possible explanation for these connections could be through the concept of quantum entanglement. It is possible that our thoughts and emotions are entangled with those of others, allowing for a non-local influence on our consciousness and behavior. However, this is still a theoretical concept and requires further research and evidence to be fully understood.

As an experimental psychologist, your ideas and thoughts on this topic are valuable and could potentially contribute to our understanding of these macroscopic singularities. It is an exciting and complex area of research, and I look forward to seeing future developments in this field.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top