How Does Optical Activity Help Measure Sugar Concentration?

AI Thread Summary
Optical activity allows for the measurement of sugar concentration in solutions by analyzing how sugar molecules rotate the plane of polarized light. The rotation angle is proportional to both the sample thickness and the concentration of the sugar. The Law of Malus is applied to calculate the intensity of light passing through polarizers, with specific calculations provided for different scenarios. A key point discussed is that halving the sugar concentration results in a corresponding change in the angle of rotation, directly affecting the light intensity measured. Understanding these relationships enables accurate determination of sugar concentration in various solutions.
chadders8903
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The sugar concentration in a solution (e.g., in a urine specimen) can be measured conveniently by using the optical activity of sugar and other asymmetric molecules. In general, an optically active molecule, like sugar, will rotate the plane of polarization through an angle that is proportional to the thickness of the sample and to the concentration of the molecule. To measure the concentration of a given solution, a sample of known thickness is placed between two polarizing filters that are at right angles to each other, as shown in the figure . The intensity of light transmitted through the two filters can be compared with a calibration chart to determine the concentration.

25-30.gif


(a) What percentage of the incident (unpolarized) light will pass through the first filter?

(b) If no sample is present, what percentage of the initial light will pass through the second filter?

(c) When a particular sample is placed between the two filters, the intersity of light emerging from the second filter is 46.0% of the incident intensity. Through what angle did the sample rotate the plane of polarization?

(d) A second sample has half the sugar concentration of the first sample. What percentage of the initial light passes through the second filter in this case?

Homework Equations



Law of Malus
I= Io cos2 (theta)
and for unpolarized light going through the first polarizer
I=.5Io

The Attempt at a Solution



The first three problems are easy and I have gotten them correct. It is d that is giving me problems.

a. I=.5Io
so I= 50%

b. Law of Malus
I= Io cos2 (theta)
theta is 90 and cos2 90 = 0
0%

c. This one is the Law of Malus but drawn out over a few steps. And you have to do either arccos of the answer and then subtract it from 90 because it gives you the answer of the wrong angle and you need the other one or you can just do arcsin.

so:
Law of Malus
I= Io cos2 (theta)
.46= .5 cos2 (theta)
.92= cos2 (theta)
sqroot (.92) = cos (theta)
.959 = cos (theta)
arccos .959 = theta
theta = 16.43
but this is the opposite angle, so
90 - 16.43 = 73.6

d.
Now for the one that I do not understand and that I keep getting wrong. And my book states that a solution containing optically active molecules that are placed between crossed polarizers, the amount of light that passes through the system gives a direct measure of the concentration of the active molecules in the solution. I do not understand how it gives the direct measure of concentration, but I will attempt a solution for this.

First I don't know how changing the concentration will affect it. Which variable is changed?

I think that it will change the 46% to 23%. So that means that

Law of Malus
I= Io cos2 (theta)
.23= .5 cos2 (theta)
.46 =cos2 (theta)
sqroot .46 = cos (theta)
.678 = cos (theta)
arccos .678 = theta
47.3 = theta
And again, wrong angle so minus it from 90
90 -47.3 = 42.7

then we multiply them all together for each intensity

.5 * cos2 (42.7) * cos2 (90-42.7) = 12.4 %.
This is off by more than 10%. I know the range of the value is between like 14% to 20%. Can someone give me a hint? I have three of the four parts correct but this last one is giving me problems.
 

Attachments

  • 25-30.gif
    25-30.gif
    13.4 KB · Views: 1,016
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured it out. changing the concentration by half changes the angle by half. So using the law of Malus I do:
I2= ½(I0)cos2((90- (answer to part c/2)
Solving that gives me the right answer.
 
Welcome to Physics Forums :smile:

Glad it worked out.

As a welcoming gift, here is a copy-and-pastable θ for you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top