How Does Orbital Radius Change with a Time-Varying Solar Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fizzwhiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Orbit
fizzwhiz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An approach to the problem of finding how orbital radius changes with solar mass is to solve the radial equation of motion for a gravitational force that has an explicit time dependence based on the assumed rate of mass loss. Show by numerically solving this equation of motion that one gets the result D proportional to 1/M.


Homework Equations



I'm not entirely sure what equation of motion the question requires. We can equate the gravitational force with the centripetal force,

mv2/D = GMm/D2

but I'm unsure as to how to include the time-dependent solar mass.

I think we can assume the changes in mass per orbit are small and uniform.


The Attempt at a Solution




I tried replacing the constant mass M in the above equation with M(t) and differentiating with respect to t, and using the angular momentum to express v in terms of D, but it's not really getting me anywhere.

Any advice on how to approach this problem would be greatly appreciated. :D
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi fizzwhiz! welcome to pf! :wink:

i think they mean, what happens to the same planet as the solar mass changes?

so v won't be constant, but the angular momentum of the planet will :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top