How Does Positivity in C*-Algebras Relate to Their Representations?

Oxymoron
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
If I have a faithful nondegenerate representation of a C*-algebra, A:

\pi\,:\,A \rightarrow B(\mathcal{H})

where B(\mathcal{H}) is the set of all bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space. And just suppose that a\geq 0 \in A. How is the fact that a is positive got anything to do with \pi(a) being positive?

Apparantly there is an if and only if relationship!? How does one begin to prove something like a\geq 0 \Leftrightarrow \pi(a) \geq 0 \in B(\mathcal{H})?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Define positive for me again for a C* alg.
 
Let A be a C*-algebra, and a,b \in A. Then a\geq b if a-b has the form c^*c for some c\in A. In particular, a is positive if a = c^*c for some c \in A.
 
Well, one implication is obvious a positive implies pi(a) positive since pi is a *-homomorphism.

Conversely, hmm, well, faithfulness and nondegeneracy must come into it somewhere.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top