How Does Relativistic Doppler Effect Impact Perception in Space Travel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sodaMay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Outside Spaceship
sodaMay
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
An outside observer will perceive my spaceship as being shorter, but what will i see of my outside surroundings? Will they be longer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


sodaMay said:
An outside observer will perceive my spaceship as being shorter, but what will i see of my outside surroundings? Will they be longer?
Depends what you mean by perceive. He certainly will not actually see it shorter. Only when he draws a choordinate chart he will conclude it is shorter.

Roger Penrose and James Terrell are the folks who thought a bit deeper about length contraction than others who just parrot the dogma that it is directly observable. :smile:
 


sodaMay said:
An outside observer will perceive my spaceship as being shorter, but what will i see of my outside surroundings? Will they be longer?
In relativity there's a difference between what you see visually and what you measure in your own rest frame. What you see is affected by the fact that light from different events (or different parts of a single object) takes different amounts of time to reach you; the coordinates you assign to events are based on compensating for such delays, the usual method being for each observer to use a network of rulers and synchronized clocks at rest relative to himself, and defining the coordinates of events purely in terms of local measurements on this system (for example, if I see an explosion happen next to the 12-meter mark on my x-axis ruler, and the clock sitting on that mark reads 5 seconds at the moment the explosion happens next to it, then I assign that event coordinates x=12 meters, t=5 seconds in my frame).

When people talk about length contraction, they are talking about what's measured in your frame, not what you see visually (the visual size is influenced by something called the Penrose-Terrell effect which MeJennifer mentioned). But as far as how length contracts in different frames, the effect is completely symmetrical--if you are moving at 0.95c relative to an observer on a space station, then in the station's frame your ship's length will appear shrunk, but in your frame the ship's length will be normal and the length the station will be shrunk, by exactly the same factor (keep in mind that in your frame, your ship is at rest while it is the station that is moving at 0.95c away from you, and in relativity there is no objective physical truth about how fast any object is 'really' moving, all speeds are relative to your frame of reference).
 


sodaMay said:
An outside observer will perceive my spaceship as being shorter, but what will i see of my outside surroundings? Will they be longer?
The visual effects are symmetric. The 'distortion' seen by the outside observer as he looks at your spaceship will be the same as the 'distortion' seen by you as you look outside.

As to precisely what the distortion is, is complicated; I haven't worked it out myself. There will surely be some shortening involved, but I've heard that, visually, the distortion looks more like a rotation.
 


Wikipedia has a decent description, in part :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrell_rotation

Terrell's paper pointed out that although special relativity appeared to describe an "observed contraction" in moving objects, these interpreted "observations" were not to be confused with the theory's literal predictions for the visible appearance of a moving object. Thanks to the differential timelag effects in signals reaching the observer from the object's different parts, a receding object would appear contracted, an approaching object would appear elongated (even under special relativity) and the geometry of a passing object would appear skewed.

I had forgotton reading about this for the first time about a month or so ago and never got to post the obvious question: Is there an analogous effect for time dilation? Why?
 


Naty1 said:
I had forgotton reading about this for the first time about a month or so ago and never got to post the obvious question: Is there an analogous effect for time dilation? Why?
I'd say the relativistic Doppler effect is the closest analogy; because of this effect, a clock moving towards you will visually appear sped up rather than slowed down, and a clock moving away from you will visually appear slowed down by a factor greater than the time dilation factor.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top