How Does Relativistic Kinetic Energy Derive from Force Integration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the relativistic kinetic energy using force integration. The integral expression for kinetic energy is presented, leading to a relationship involving the terms mv and dm. A key point is the lecturer's assertion that mv\,dv + v^2\,dm equals c^2\,dm, prompting a request for guidance on combining these integrals. Participants suggest differentiating the relativistic mass equation to derive the necessary integrand. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly determining the limits for the integrals involved.
kudoushinichi88
Messages
125
Reaction score
2
In the derivation of the relativistic kinetic energy,

K=\int_{x_1}^{x_2}F\,dx = \int_{0}^{v}\frac{d}{dt}(mv)\,dx = \int_{0}^{v}(mv\,dv+v^2\,dm)

here, my lecturer told us without showing that

mv\,dv+v^2\,dm = c^2\,dm

Can someone please give me hints on how to combine these two integrals? I have no idea how to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kudoushinichi88 said:
In the derivation of the relativistic kinetic energy,

K=\int_{x_1}^{x_2}F\,dx = \int_{0}^{v}\frac{d}{dt}(mv)\,dx = \int_{0}^{v}(mv\,dv+v^2\,dm)
You need to be a bit more careful with the limits. The integral with respect to dm doesn't have as limits 0 and v.
here, my lecturer told us without showing that

mv\,dv+v^2\,dm = c^2\,dm

Can someone please give me hints on how to combine these two integrals? I have no idea how to start.
You can show by differentiating the expression for the relativistic mass

m = \frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}

with respect to v. The LHS of the result the lecturer gave you is the integrand, so just substitute it into get

K = \int c^2\,dm

I'll leave it to you to figure out the proper limits.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top