How Does Rocket Propulsion Work in the Vacuum of Space?

AI Thread Summary
Rocket propulsion in the vacuum of space relies on the conservation of momentum, represented by the equation P = mv + (m_0 - m)(v - u). The discussion highlights a potential error in calculating total momentum, emphasizing that both mass and velocity are time-dependent variables. The total momentum must remain constant, leading to the conclusion that the derivative of momentum with respect to time is zero. This differentiation ultimately simplifies to the standard rocket equation, m dv = u dm, illustrating the relationship between changing mass and velocity during propulsion. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate modeling of rocket behavior in space.
Euclid
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
For a rocket in free space, it seems that
P = mv + (m_0 - m)(v-u)
where m is the mass of the rocket, v is its speed, m_0 is its initial mass, u is the speed of the propellent relative to the ship.
But in solving dP/dt=0, I get that the velocity is linear in m. There seems to be a mistake in what I have taken to be the total momentum. Can anyone point it out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
P = (m+dm)(v+dv) + (-dm)(v-v_{ex}) Both dm and dv are functions of time.
 
The problem is I am trying to solve the problem without appealing to the use of infinitesimals. It seems to me I should be able to write down P, differentiate and solve, with having to use these bizarre little quantities. What you have written is mv, the momentum of the rocket, not what I am calling P, the total momentum of the system, which must be constant.
 
Hmmm, well then using your notation and variables (not what I would have used) we get

const = P =
\int -(v(t)-u)\frac{dm}{dt} dt + m(t)*v(t)<br /> <br /> for the same reason that cyrusabdollahi wrote - v is not a constant, it is a function of time. We want to add together all the exhaust masses dm moving at a velocity of v(t)-u. Note that dm/dt is <0, that's the reason for the minus sign in the first equation (easy to miss).<br /> <br /> If we differentiate this expression with respect to time, the derivative is zero becaue it's constant, and we get<br /> <br /> <br /> -(v(t)-u) \frac{dm}{dt} + m(t)\frac{dv}{dt} + v(t)\frac{dm}{dt} = 0<br /><br /> <br /> which reduces to the standard rocket equation<br /> <br /> m dv = u dm or <br /> v = u \int \frac{dm}{m}
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top