How Does Rolling Affect the Speed and Time of a Sphere Down an Incline?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics_geek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a solid sphere rolling down an incline versus sliding down without rolling. For the rolling case, the total energy at the bottom combines translational and rotational energy, leading to a speed of v = sqrt(10gh/7). In contrast, for the sliding case, the speed is v = sqrt(2gh), which is higher since it only accounts for translational kinetic energy. The time intervals to reach the bottom differ, with the rolling sphere taking longer due to its lower speed. Overall, rolling affects both the speed and time taken to descend an incline compared to sliding.
physics_geek
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid sphere is released from height h from the top of an incline making an angle θ with the horizontal.
(a) Calculate the speed of the sphere when it reaches the bottom of the incline in the case that it rolls without slipping. (Use g,h, and theta for θ as necessary.)
(b) Calculate the speed of the sphere when it reaches the bottom of the incline in the case that it slides frictionlessly without rolling. (Use g,h, and theta for θ as necessary.)
(c) Compare the time intervals required to reach the bottom in cases (a) and (b).
rolling time/sliding time =

Homework Equations


no idea


The Attempt at a Solution


again no idea..any helpful starts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can do questions like this using forces and accelerations, but it is MUCH easier to do them with energy formulas. Basically,
Energy at top = energy at bottom
PE at top = KE at bottom + rotational energy at bottom

With that start, you can't go wrong - begin by putting in the detailed formula for each kind of energy.
 
yea thanks a lot!
i think i got it
 
Let's answer b) first. The total kinetic energy at the bottom is mgh, independent of theta. When the sliding ball reaches the bottom, mgh = (0.5)mv^2, and v=sqr(2gh).
Let's answer a) now. Again the total energy is mgh. However now, the potential energy has been converted to both energy of translation (0.5)mv^2 AND energy of rotation. Because the moment of inertia of a uniformly dense sphere is (2/5)mr^2, the energy of rotation is
(1/5)m(r^2)(dtheta/dt)^2 = (1/5)mv^2. So when the ball rolls without slipping, the kinetic energy at the bottom is mgh = (1/2 + 1/5)mv^2 = (7/10)mv^2, and so now v=sqr(10gh/7). So now the translational velocity is lower.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top