How Does Rutherford Scattering Explain Particle Detection at Specific Angles?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the fraction of alpha particles detected at a specific angle using the Rutherford scattering equation. A gold foil of thickness 16.7 nm is used, with a radioactive source emitting particles at 10.50 MeV, and the detector positioned 24.5 cm away. The calculated fraction of alpha particles detected per unit area at an angle of 13.6 degrees is approximately 5.38 x 10^-11. Additionally, the fraction of particles scattering at angles of 13.6 degrees or higher is determined through integration of the scattering equation, yielding a result based on the same parameters. This analysis illustrates the application of Rutherford scattering principles in particle detection.
PhatPartie
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A) While reproducing the Rutherford scattering experiment in an advanced laboratory class, a student uses a gold foil with thickness 16.7 nm. The radioactive source emits a particles at 10.50 MeV, and the detector is placed at 24.5 cm from the target foil. What fraction of the a particles is detected per unit area at an angle of 13.6 degrees?

B) What fraction of the a particles will scatter to the angle given above or higher?

A .. fraction/area = N(theta) / Ni ...n = #/volume ...n = 5.90*10^22 ...dont really no where to go from here ... i have the equation Ntheta = Ni(n)(t)/16 r^2 (rmin)^2 1/(sin^4 theta/2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
but i dont know what the values are. B) The fraction of a particles that will scatter to the angle given above or higher can be calculated using the Rutherford scattering equation, which states that N(theta) = Ni(n)(t)/16r^2 (rmin)^2 1/(sin^4 theta/2). In this equation, Ni is the number of a particles incident on the target foil, n is the number density of gold atoms in the foil, t is the foil's thickness, r is the distance between the source and the detector, and theta is the angle of the scattered particles. Plugging in the given values, we get N(theta) = 5.90*10^22 / 16(24.5 cm)^2 (1.46 cm)^2 1/(sin^4 13.6°/2), which is equal to 0.0417. This means that 0.0417 of the a particles will scatter to angles of 13.6° or higher.
 


A) To find the fraction of a particles detected per unit area at an angle of 13.6 degrees, we can use the Rutherford scattering equation:

N(theta) = Ni(n)(t)/16 r^2 (rmin)^2 1/(sin^4 theta/2)

Where N(theta) is the number of particles scattered at an angle theta, Ni is the initial number of particles, n is the number density of the target foil (given in the problem as 5.90*10^22), t is the thickness of the foil (given as 16.7 nm), r is the distance from the source to the detector (given as 24.5 cm), and rmin is the minimum distance of closest approach (given as the radius of a gold atom, which is approximately 1.2*10^-15 m).

Plugging in the values, we get:

N(13.6) = (5.90*10^22)(10.50 MeV)(16.7 nm)/(16)(24.5 cm)^2 ((1.2*10^-15 m)^2)(1/(sin^4 13.6/2))

N(13.6) = 3.17*10^12 particles

To find the fraction of a particles detected per unit area, we need to divide this number by the total number of particles emitted by the source, which is equal to Ni. Therefore, the fraction of a particles detected per unit area at an angle of 13.6 degrees is:

N(13.6)/Ni = 3.17*10^12/5.90*10^22 = 5.38*10^-11

B) To find the fraction of a particles that will scatter to the angle given above or higher, we can use the same equation but integrate over all angles greater than or equal to 13.6 degrees:

N(>=13.6) = ∫N(theta)d(theta) = Ni(n)(t)/16 r^2 (rmin)^2 ∫1/sin^4 theta/2 d(theta) from 13.6 to 180 degrees

This integral can be solved using trigonometric identities and the result is:

N(>=13.6) = (5.90*10^22)(10.50 MeV)(16.7 nm)/(16)(24.5 cm)^2 ((1
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top