How Does Schwartz Derive the Schrödinger Equation from QFT?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dm4b
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Qft Qm
dm4b
Messages
363
Reaction score
4
In Matthew Schwartz's QFT text, he derives the Schrödinger Equation in the low-energy limit. I got lost on one of the steps.

First he mentions that

$$ \Psi (x) = <x| \Psi>,\tag{2.83}$$

which satisfies

$$i\partial _t\Psi(x)=i\partial_t< 0|\phi (\vec{x},t)|\Psi>=i<0|\partial_t\phi(\vec{x},t)|\Psi>.\tag{2.84}$$

That was all fine and good, but he lost me on the next part, going from the first line (i) to the second (ii).

(i)$$i<0|\partial_t\phi(\vec{x},t)|\Psi>=<0|\int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi )^3} \frac{\sqrt{\vec{p}^2+m^2}}{\sqrt{2\omega _p}}(a_pe^{-ipx}-a_{p}^{\dagger}e^{ipx})|\Psi>$$
(ii)$$=<0|\sqrt{m^2-\vec{\nabla}^2}\phi_0(\vec{x},t)|\Psi>.\tag{2.85}$$

He apparently uses the Klein-Gordon Equation:

$$\partial _{t}^{2}\phi_0=(\vec{\nabla} ^2-m^2)\phi_0$$

to get the following term

$$\sqrt{m^2-\vec{\nabla}^2}$$

in equation (ii) above, but not quite sure how. Can anyone help me out?

I realize you can expand in terms of $$p^2/m$$ and make use of $$\nabla^2e^{ipx}=-p^2e^{-ipx}$$ to pull the terms out, but I'm really interested in how he uses the KG equation to achieve the same result.

This is on page 24 for those that have the text.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured out the answer to this, if an admin would like to delete the OP. Didn't see a way to do that myself
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
QM limit of QFT, in general, is quite an interesting and nontrivial topic, so just because you solved a technical difficulty is not a reason to not continue the discussion.

For instance, there is no position operator in the relativistic theory, but there is in the non-relativistic limit. How about that? I have my own answer, but there is no general consensus on that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and dm4b

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K