How Does Source Motion Affect Frequency in the Doppler Effect for Sound?

AI Thread Summary
The Doppler Effect describes how the frequency of sound changes based on the motion of the source relative to the listener. When a sound source moves towards a listener, the sound waves become compressed, resulting in shorter wavelengths and higher frequencies. Conversely, if the source moves away, the waves stretch, leading to longer wavelengths and lower frequencies. The discussion highlights that the speed of sound remains constant in the medium, and the perceived frequency changes due to the relative motion of the source. Additionally, if the source exceeds the speed of sound, it can create a sonic boom due to overlapping wave crests.
hasanhabibul
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
we know...when a source is running towards the listener...the wavelenth of sound become small and number of waves inceases...as far as i know ..the logic behind is..when a source runs..then waves become congested in a small distance between source and listener...it is so far so ridiculous to me how waves become congested for the relative motion ...why frequecy i.e. structure of the wave has a headache with motion of both source and the listener... why this happens ...what is the relation of source motion with the frequency when frequency of a source has a constant value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can I attempt an answer?

Imagine the source is moving relative to the medium the waves are produced in, and the waves move with a constant velocity through the medium - as is the case with sound. Imagine the source is approaching you, and it is traveling slower than the speed of the waves. At a certain location, it makes the first pulse of sound. It then moves forward behind the advancing sound wave, and a moment later creates the next pulse of sound.

By "pulse of sound" I don't mean a "beep", but since all sounds are waves, sound waves come with crests and troughs. By the "pulse" I mean the point where the source creates the "crest" of each sound wave. For very low frequency sound waves, you can sometimes feel the crests and troughs of sound waves as vibrations in the ground or floor.

Therefore, as the source is moving forwards towards you, the distance between the "crest" of the first sound wave, and the "crest" of the next sound wave will be shorter than if the source were stationary. Therefore the waves will have shorter wavelength. As the waves move with a constant speed, they will therefore arrive at where you are with a higher frequency.

For someone on the far side of the source, who the source is moving away from, the crests between the waves will be further apart than if the source was stationary. Therefore the waves will have a longer wavelength and a lower frequency.

Note that if you are moving through the medium with the same speed and direction as the source, the waves would sound the same as if you both were stationary. Think about it.

I'm waiting for someone to bring in relativity here, which I've ignored. But for normal events we experience in ordinary life here on earth, this is the situation. Mind you, once you've grasped this, you are ready for Einstein's relativity.

If the source is moving faster than the speed of the waves, at a certain point to the side of the source, the crests of each wave will double up and overlap, creating a huge bang or "sonic boom".
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top