How Does Special Relativity Affect the Mass of Colliding Particles?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass of two identical particles that collide after one is accelerated by a constant force. Key concepts include the conservation of energy and momentum, which are essential for determining the resulting mass post-collision. The participant expresses confusion regarding the energy and momentum of the mass before impact and questions the complexity of their calculations. They suggest using the equation E² = p²c² + (2m)²c² for the energy and momentum analysis. The conversation highlights the challenges of applying special relativity principles in collision scenarios.
coppersauce
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two identical masses m are initially at rest, separated by a distance x. A constant force F
accelerates one particle until it collides and combines with the other. What is the mass of
the resulting particle?

Homework Equations



F = gamma3mv

The Attempt at a Solution



Presumably you must calculate conservation of energy (which is whatever the energy is of the single mass moving must equal that of them combined).

Then I guess you need to calculate conservation of momentum, which should also be easy especially since it's in one direction after all.

Lastly you could just plug it into the equation E2 = p2c2 + (2m)2c2

The thing I don't understand is what energy/momentum the mass has pre-impact. We've never done a problem with the equation I gave before so I'm not sure if it's needed, but in any case I attempted solving with that equation for F and then multiplying by t to get the momentum and got c3*m*a*t/(c2 - (at)2)3/2 which seemed way too complicated for so early. I would also just do energy of the big mass = gamma*m*c^2+mc^2 and that would give me the part for E^2 and i w ould have all necessary parts... But I don't know if my original thing is right at all :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top