How does sugar concentration affect the growth of microbes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Emieno
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Sugar concentration does influence microbial growth, but the amount reaching gastrointestinal bacteria is typically not significant enough to cause harm. Most ingested sugar is absorbed during digestion, and only high concentrations could create an osmotic imbalance detrimental to microbes. While increased sugar can promote microbial growth in controlled settings, it can also lead to acid or alcohol production, which may be harmful in closed systems. However, in the intestines, these byproducts can be utilized by other bacteria and are regularly flushed out. Overall, moderate sugar intake is unlikely to negatively impact gut microbiota.
Emieno
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Newbie--Sugar for Microbes

I just learned that sugar concentration can influence the growth of microbes, does it mean if I take quite a lot of sugar/glucose, my gastrointestinal bacteria will gradually die out ?
thanksyu ;)
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Probably not, the concentration of sugar/glucose that would reach the microflora would not be significant. First most of the sugar ingested would be taken during the digestion process. Secondly, the concentration of sugar would have to be in the range that you create a great osmotic imbalance between the microbe and its environment. Thirdly, an increase in sugar/glucose may lead to more growth in the microflora.

Sugar has influence over the growth of microbes but in often evaluated under laboratory setting. For example, increasing sugar concentration in a media solution will increase the growth rate of an microbes until it reach a plateau (i.e. the enzyme system is saturated). However, there is so consequence that comes with different sugar concentration. For example, some bacteria produce acid from sugars and yeast produce alcohol from sugar. So the higher the concentration the more acid/alcohol is produce and this will eventually kill the bacteria. In a close system (i.e. in flask) the acid production is a factor to consider but in your intestine, the acid may be used by other bacteria and it is flush out.
 
iansmith said:
Probably not, the concentration of sugar/glucose that would reach the microflora would not be significant. First most of the sugar ingested would be taken during the digestion process. Secondly, the concentration of sugar would have to be in the range that you create a great osmotic imbalance between the microbe and its environment. Thirdly, an increase in sugar/glucose may lead to more growth in the microflora.

Sugar has influence over the growth of microbes but in often evaluated under laboratory setting. For example, increasing sugar concentration in a media solution will increase the growth rate of an microbes until it reach a plateau (i.e. the enzyme system is saturated). However, there is so consequence that comes with different sugar concentration. For example, some bacteria produce acid from sugars and yeast produce alcohol from sugar. So the higher the concentration the more acid/alcohol is produce and this will eventually kill the bacteria. In a close system (i.e. in flask) the acid production is a factor to consider but in your intestine, the acid may be used by other bacteria and it is flush out.
Thanks for clearing up my doubt.;)
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Back
Top