How Does the Archimedean Property Imply b^2 ≤ 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abraham
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Property
Abraham
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
This isn't really hw. I need someone to explain a certain line in a proof:

" b2 \leq \frac{1}{n} for all n in the natural numbers. This implies that b2 \leq 0 (a consequence of the Archimedean property). "

I don't see how the Archimedean is applied in this context. This is my understanding of the property: For real numbers x,y, x>0, there exists a natural number n such that nx > y.

I don't see how this proves b2 \leq \frac{1}{n} \Rightarrow b2 \leq 0.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apply the Archimedean property with b^2=x and y=1. You know b^2>=0. If b is not zero then b^2>0. If nb^2>1 then b^2>1/n. It's a proof by contradiction.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top