Abraham
- 68
- 0
This isn't really hw. I need someone to explain a certain line in a proof:
" b2 \leq \frac{1}{n} for all n in the natural numbers. This implies that b2 \leq 0 (a consequence of the Archimedean property). "
I don't see how the Archimedean is applied in this context. This is my understanding of the property: For real numbers x,y, x>0, there exists a natural number n such that nx > y.
I don't see how this proves b2 \leq \frac{1}{n} \Rightarrow b2 \leq 0.
Thanks
" b2 \leq \frac{1}{n} for all n in the natural numbers. This implies that b2 \leq 0 (a consequence of the Archimedean property). "
I don't see how the Archimedean is applied in this context. This is my understanding of the property: For real numbers x,y, x>0, there exists a natural number n such that nx > y.
I don't see how this proves b2 \leq \frac{1}{n} \Rightarrow b2 \leq 0.
Thanks