How Does the Coefficient of Restitution Affect Collision Outcomes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nokia8650
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficient
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of the coefficient of restitution (COR) on collision outcomes between two spheres of different masses. After a collision, sphere B's speed is determined to be four times greater than sphere A's speed, based on the given COR of 1/2. When sphere B collides with a wall and then with sphere A again, the resulting COR between B and the wall is calculated to be 1/14, leading to confusion regarding the sign convention used in the markscheme. The markscheme employs a negative sign in the COR equation to accurately reflect the direction of velocities post-collision. Clarification is sought on the logic behind the use of "0 - v" versus "w" in the numerator of the COR expression.
nokia8650
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
A smooth sphere A of mass 4m is moving on a smooth horizontal plane with speed u. It
collides directly with a stationary smooth sphere B of mass 5m and with the same radius as A.

The coefficient of restitution between A and B is 1/2

(a) Show that after the collision the speed of B is 4 times greater than the speed of A.

Sphere B subsequently hits a smooth vertical wall at right angles. After rebounding from the
wall, B collides with A again and as a result of this collision, B comes to rest.

Given that the coefficient of restitution between B and the wall is e,

(b) find e. For part (b), I receive an answer of 1/14. This is due to the fact that I have equated the coefficient of resisution of the two balls in the following way for the final collision:

0.5 = v/(u+4eu)

where v = velovity of ball A after the final collision, and u = the velocity of ball A before the collision (and hence the velocity of B is -4eu).

This results in a result of e = 1/14 after solving simultaneously with a linear expression for the conservation of momentum.

However, the markscheme has done the above as: 0.5 = (0-v)/(u+4eu) - note the presence of the negative sign. This results in a result of 0.5 for the second coefficient of resistution. Can someone please explain the logic behind this?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
nokia8650 said:
However, the markscheme has done the above as: 0.5 = (0-v)/(u+4eu) - note the presence of the negative sign. This results in a result of 0.5 for the second coefficient of resistution. Can someone please explain the logic behind this?
I didn't look at the problem in detail, but this piece seems to make sense. By definition of coefficient of restitution (e):
V'a - V'b = e(Vb - Va)
v - 0 = e(u - -4e'u) = 0.5(u + 4e'u)

Where I use e' for the second COR.

(Did I miss your point?)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top