How Does the Depletion Zone Affect Current Flow in a P-N Junction?

AI Thread Summary
The depletion zone in a P-N junction significantly impacts current flow by creating a barrier that prevents charge carriers from moving freely. Despite the presence of holes and electrons, the fixed donor and acceptor atoms in the depletion layer restrict movement, unlike in normal conductors. To enable current flow, electrons must be supplied to the n-side to neutralize the positive charge in the depletion zone, while simultaneously creating holes on the p-side. The red and blue lines in the referenced figure represent the concentration of free electrons and holes, which are minimal at the junction due to the logarithmic scale. Understanding this balance is crucial for grasping how current can be established in a P-N junction.
mike2349
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been reading various explanations for a number of hours, and I'm still completely confused. I'll refer to an explanation from Wikipedia, but do point me to a better one if you know one.

What does the depletion zone have to do with current flow? Looking at Figure A (see link above), there are plenty of charge carriers throughout the depletion layer, mostly holes on the left and mostly electrons on the right. And they are in equilibrium, so there is no net force stopping them. If a potential difference is applied either way, why won't current flow through the depletion zone like in a normal conductor, with the oncoming electrons filling the oncoming holes?

In case it helps with pinpointing my source of confusion, I have (or should have) roughly high-school-level physics and chemistry knowledge (no such claims about understanding), I visualise free electrons as tiny charged balls that obey Newtonian physics and Coulomb's law and nothing more, and I don't understand how non-ionic chemical bonds work.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are no holes or loose electrons in the depletion layer. What you see in figure A, are the negatively charged acceptor atoms, and the positively charged donor atoms, that have created the free electrons and the holes that have diffused to the other side of the junction. The donor/accpetor atoms can't move. The only way of getting the p-n junction to connect is feeding in electrons on the n-side to fill in the positively charged part of the depletion layer, and removing them to create holes to fill in the negatively charged part of the depletion layer.
 
The negatively charged acceptor atoms and the positively charged donor atoms are the circled minuses and pluses, right? But what about the red and blue lines? I thought they show the free electrons and holes, which can move?
 
mike2349 said:
The negatively charged acceptor atoms and the positively charged donor atoms are the circled minuses and pluses, right? But what about the red and blue lines? I thought they show the free electrons and holes, which can move?

They show the concentration of holes. Note that it's on a logarithmic scale, so the concentration both of holes and electrons at the point where the red and the blue line meets, is very small
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Do carriers move across a p-n junction at 0 K?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Electron Current/movement in P-N junction under forward bias
Replies
3
Views
1K
What Explains the Lack of Current in a PN Junction at Equilibrium?
Replies
3
Views
2K
B What is the purpose of the depletion region in P-N junction semiconductors?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Wrong statement about a p-n junction
Replies
18
Views
2K
Depletion zone and current in forward-biased PN junction
Replies
2
Views
2K
I have a question about diodes and the PN junction
Replies
2
Views
2K
Depletion zone and current in forward-biased PN junction
Replies
3
Views
2K
Effect of Doping on Depletion Region Width
Replies
8
Views
16K
Charge density in an abrupt p-n junction
Replies
1
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top