How does the human intellectual immune system work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter coberst
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Systems
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the human intellectual immune system (HIIS), which is proposed as a mechanism that protects established ideas or "memes" from new, potentially disruptive ones. This system is likened to the physical immune system, suggesting that both evolved through Darwinian processes. The HIIS is characterized as an automatic response that can hinder the acceptance of valuable new ideas, with conservative elements in communities often resisting change. The conversation emphasizes the need for communities to engage in reasoned analysis to prevent premature rejection of innovative concepts. It also highlights the complexity and diversity of both physical and mental immune systems, arguing that oversimplifying the HIIS as merely a protector of memes fails to capture the intricate dynamics of human thought. The discussion concludes by noting that survival in evolution is not solely about having a strong immune system but also involves adaptability and diversity, as illustrated by the resilience of insects despite their lack of a robust immune response.
coberst
Messages
305
Reaction score
0
Immune system

We are all familiar with the human physical immune system, which fights off foreign invaders. We are not as familiar with the human intellectual immune system (HIIS), which fights off foreign memes. I am no expert in ether system and my analysis is based upon observation and study. I suspect all those with similar opinions, who seek authorities, can find them if they wish.

I suspect both systems are results of the evolution Darwin discovered. By the way, I want to note that Darwin’s Theory is a good example of a meme. Some other human authors of memes might be Socrates, Jesus, Galileo and recently the four judges in Massachusetts who made a judgement regarding same-sex marriage.

The purpose of the HIIS is to protect the intellectual status quo. I am confident that such an immune system is a result of evolutionary forces for the simple reason that it seems to be part of our genetic structure. I guess that every new meme faces an uphill battle against this HIIS and only the strongest memes survive.

The people, as a community, must guard against the automatic rejection apparatus of HIIS. HIIS is, I guess, an automatic response not requiring reasoned judgement. The community as a group must supply the reasoned analysis to prevent the early rejection of a new meme that might be valuable. The conservative elements of every community seem poised to fight against new memes. The obvious examples being those noted above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i suspect it's all about the trap of choosing the most convenient meme... the one that will give the individual the least worries...
we have the dark figure in our subconsiousness to deal with those sort of things on a grand scale, but usually it goes by undetected I'm afraid...

it also takes a lot of selfdiscipline to actively investigate every meme and decide whether or not it is the rigth one or just the most convenient one and then whether to record it or not...
 
There is no single "immune system" for the human body, and apparently no single one for the mind either. Like the brain itself, the human immune systems have proven quite diverse and complex.

Above all else, evolution tends to favor diversity and flexibility. The alternative tends to lead to stagnation and eventual extinction. Hence, humanity possesses the most complex immune system in the animal kingdom, both physically and mentally. So complex are these system, that they cannot be totally distinguished from other processes in the body.

The idea that our "mental immune systems" exist to protect our memes is therefore a gross oversimplification. According to Darwinian evolution, what survives simply survives. For example, insects have no appreciable immune system and some ninty percent die from infectious diseases. However, they make up for this by the shear number of prodgeny they bear and the ability to adapt to extreme chemical and radiation conditions that would kill just about any other plant or animal. Supposidly they would be among the only survivors of a global nuclear war.

Does that mean they have a stronger immune system? No, words only have demonstrable meaning according to their function in a given context. In the case of this thread, you are simply redefining the term "immune systems". If this is merely an anology on your part, it is too limited to describe all that can be observed about the functioning of the human mind.
 
Last edited:
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top